From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE6C3C2BA4; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782382129; cv=none; b=cNRcyrZsQx0ooQ2lvRA8NZ3m+AXhnKlrOB0APadmWef1OUCXFfoXFQB3eBqsWR1llGHdrgqfNMRTQhwSAML0lSObWED1u/LY/SpNoyuU1Dlh7kBNBR9MctXNBCjXI1etvPPa3kVqex3Is+B4XL1UcsNlrQMoMU3b4jA9FX9zQJM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782382129; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SQBp1/yV1ekWdS6nTZnnRLDYKd2I+3byYL5QANtkNHg=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mVrgEbcu1WYGt3JHhdGCWJc3xf6F5usHTSImuBxfYjoA2KBMWSkbXWOK4sxkP5IFi4Gd3o+sSpvsNA1pZl9yenttilUBTcRc6dSOQimK2iSJNq8HjH2TfUYJAWmPDmgBFFHBQelAKiZYejeeU6ntKFT9Iojj2QyX0ejlGJ8iYvg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=VMQtoI1a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="VMQtoI1a" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1782382129; x=1813918129; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=SQBp1/yV1ekWdS6nTZnnRLDYKd2I+3byYL5QANtkNHg=; b=VMQtoI1auc2e+1fxiIZzteqHkV2INnjmnFQiBKpB56E0qJo9Fb0mP70z wUmOFgOuN1oLxHFWktMctmPmv5Pyl2yyo+yWDYC5Fw0hN2Qiwt8Th5UAX 5Ql2Cw6DW0pjb2QMWIFxgA9EmIjHFiOkSD3hpE1O6R6lfmhv8cwiqguqx 1a2cCXWsix56HxoUQanAa42SiZ9ZKjXaZDzOSokhH1iNKBe4NJijPWtxD 9UvOUzbOcMiVJlL8L7nQsPZpXLNL1Nn3HgZHhWOoffguNVnXlMMRPnpRw T3rH4HE2JbflHXH/ScumrlAwBhiWMx8tPzfFnn4g1HELl5wO77e2S75e3 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: v1Y4xKOhSP+0jC1Prj9+Mg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +/FkZLilTr2TOjrnDN7IbA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11827"; a="82276680" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,224,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="82276680" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jun 2026 03:08:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XWgTOkmjTHSllxAY9JmTuA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MbtkjO3uQXGUFTFe6b4glQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,224,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="250697879" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.153]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jun 2026 03:08:45 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 13:08:42 +0300 (EEST) To: Mario Limonciello cc: Shyam Sundar S K , Hans de Goede , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Alexandre Belloni Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 1/2] rtc: Add rtc_read_next_alarm() to read next expiring timer In-Reply-To: <9415b405-ec6c-425b-8abb-42964f5a2b3a@amd.com> Message-ID: References: <20260521043714.1022930-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <178233558814.1517260.7453046865036017375.b4-ty@b4> <9415b405-ec6c-425b-8abb-42964f5a2b3a@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 24 Jun 2026, Mario Limonciello wrote: > On 6/24/26 14:15, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On Wed, 20 May 2026 23:37:13 -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > > Add a new function rtc_read_next_alarm() that reads the next expiring > > > alarm from the RTC timerqueue. This is different from rtc_read_alarm(), > > > which only reads the aie_timer. > > > > > > The wakealarm sysfs file programs the rtc->aie_timer, whereas the > > > alarmtimer suspend routine programs its own timer into the RTC timerqueue. > > > Both timers end up in the RTC's timerqueue, and the first expiring timer > > > is what gets armed in the hardware. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/2] rtc: Add rtc_read_next_alarm() to read next expiring timer > > https://git.kernel.org/abelloni/c/947d7ea6f60b > > > > Best regards, > > > > Thanks! > > Ilpo, Shyam, > > How do you want to handle patch 2/2? Immutable branch and come through pdx86? > Or would you rather it go through Alexandre's tree? It would be easier if it too goes through Alexandre's tree and I don't expect conflicts on that area. I've replied with my Ack to 2/2. -- i.