mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@gmail.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp_tw_recycle broken?
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:47:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9be06770811150747l574badc1l8d509baae4f81ac5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874p2916hb.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> "Karl Pickett" <karl.pickett@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> May I just confirm.. is tcp_tw_reuse NOT dependent on receiving timestamps?
>
> The big problem is that both are incompatible with NAT. So if you
> ever talk to any NATed clients don't use it.
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@linux.intel.com
>


Hmph.  Running the test again - after getting a little sleep -
timestamps do indeed determine if tw_reuse/recyle work.  I must not
have let all the tw buckets expire before changing my timestamp
settings last night.

Since
A. I don't want to rely on arbitrary web servers having timestamps
B. People say it breaks NAT for clients, and the settings are global only,

I will just set TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN to 10 seconds and call it a day.
Sure would be nice if it was a tunable, so only the most heavily
loaded customers could set it...

-- 
Karl Pickett

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-15 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-15  4:37 Karl Pickett
2008-11-15  5:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-11-15  7:29   ` Karl Pickett
2008-11-15 13:09     ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-15 15:47       ` Karl Pickett [this message]
2008-11-15 15:52         ` Willy Tarreau
     [not found]   ` <f9be06770811142325j79ca0831j7d5820716199811@mail.gmail.com>
2008-11-15  7:45     ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9be06770811150747l574badc1l8d509baae4f81ac5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=karl.pickett@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®