From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756619AbaCOWk0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:40:26 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:45546 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756219AbaCOWkY (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:40:24 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1394913720-6466-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> References: <1394913720-6466-1-git-send-email-imammedo@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVAPS and MOVAPD SSE instructions From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:39:48 -0700 To: Igor Mammedov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: gleb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MOVAPS, MOVAPD, and MOVDQA are the same operation. They may, architecturally, have different performance characteristics, but nothing that would affect an emulator. On March 15, 2014 1:01:58 PM PDT, Igor Mammedov wrote: >MS HCK test fails on 32-bit Windows 8.1 due to missing MOVAPS >instruction emulation, this series adds it and while at it, >it adds emulation of MOVAPD which is trivial to implement on >top of MOVAPS. > >Igor Mammedov (2): > KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVAPS > KVM: x86 emulator: emulate MOVAPD > > arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.