Re: [PATCH][RFC] platform/x86: intel_speed_select: Use static_cpu_has for HWP check

[srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, 2026-02-27 at 22:51 -0500, lirongqing wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> 
> The current implementation of disable_dynamic_sst_features() reads
> MSR_PM_ENABLE to check if HWP is enabled. This can be optimized by
> using static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP), which is the standard way
> in the kernel to check for HWP support without the overhead of
> an MSR read.
> 
> Replace the MSR read with static_cpu_has().
> 
That is not same. Presence of HWP feature means that HWP can be enabled
on this SoC. But user can boot with option to not enable HWP by
intel_pstate driver.
If HWP is not enabled, then SST features can't be enabled.

Thanks,
Srinivas

> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c | 5 +---
> -
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git
> a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> index b8cdaa2..416620b 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/speed_select_if/isst_tpmi_core.c
> @@ -556,10 +556,7 @@ static struct tpmi_per_power_domain_info
> *get_instance(int pkg_id, int power_dom
>  
>  static bool disable_dynamic_sst_features(void)
>  {
> -	u64 value;
> -
> -	rdmsrq(MSR_PM_ENABLE, value);
> -	return !(value & 0x1);
> +	return !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP);
>  }
>  
>  #define _read_cp_info(name_str, name, offset, start, width,
> mult_factor)\