From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751516AbdBXWXz (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:23:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41]:36218 "EHLO mail-pg0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751426AbdBXWXx (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:23:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] blk-mq: allocate blk_mq_tags and requests in correct node To: Shaohua Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org References: Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, hch@lst.de From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:23:50 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/01/2017 12:09 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 02/01/2017 09:53 AM, Shaohua Li wrote: >> blk_mq_tags/requests of specific hardware queue are mostly used in >> specific cpus, which might not be in the same numa node as disk. For >> example, a nvme card is in node 0. half hardware queue will be used by >> node 0, the other node 1. > > All three patches look good to me. Bjorn, to avoid complications, if > you can review/ack patch #2, then I will queue it up through the block > tree for 4.11. Bjorn, ping. You were CC'ed on the original patch three weeks ago. -- Jens Axboe