From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: NOMMU: work around maybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:11:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa406984-11dc-a6d9-b181-f0287afd746a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171102130734.GZ9463@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On 02/11/17 13:07, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:25:47PM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 02/11/17 09:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The reworked MPU code produces a new warning in some configurations,
>>> presumably starting with the code move after the compiler now makes
>>> different inlining decisions:
>>>
>>> arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c: In function 'adjust_lowmem_bounds_mpu':
>>> arch/arm/mm/pmsa-v7.c:310:5: error: 'specified_mem_size' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
>>>
>>> This appears to be harmless, as we know that there is always at
>>> least one memblock, and the only way this could get triggered is
>>> if the for_each_memblock() loop was never entered.
>>>
>>> I could not come up with a better workaround than initializing
>>> the specified_mem_size to zero, but at least that is the value
>>> that the variable would have in the hypothetical case of no
>>> memblocks.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 877ec119dbbf ("ARM: 8706/1: NOMMU: Move out MPU setup in separate module")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> ---
>>> Vladimir, if this looks good to you, can you forward it to Russell's
>>> patch tracker, or otherwise suggest a different fix?
>>
>> Accepted as patch 8719/1. Not sure if Russell will pick it up or not... anyway,
>> thanks for the patch!
>
> I'd prefer not to at this stage. Same things that apply that I said
> in the "ARM: early_printk: use printascii() rather than printch()"
> thread - I need to ensure that what I have is stable before 4.14 is
> released, so I'm not accepting anything further unless it is _really_
> urgent.
Yes, I saw that thread, it is why that "not sure" thing.
>
> This isn't urgent.
>
Should I resubmit after -rc1 or you'll apply it directly from patch tracker?
Thanks
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-02 9:21 Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-02 12:25 ` Vladimir Murzin
2017-11-02 13:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-02 13:11 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
2017-11-02 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa406984-11dc-a6d9-b181-f0287afd746a@arm.com \
--to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®