From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/PM: Put devices to low power state on shutdown
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:38:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa504022-acb3-4930-b6b8-87a8dcb912c3@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <319e5419-3b12-4672-9f51-f90c5e142e29@amd.com>
On 9/11/2024 14:16, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On 9/11/2024 14:05, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 02:24:11PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>>> Some laptops wake up after poweroff when HP Thunderbolt Dock G4 is
>>> connected.
>>>
>>> The following error message can be found during shutdown:
>>> pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Correctable error message received from
>>> 0000:09:04.0
>>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Correctable,
>>> type=Data Link Layer, (Receiver ID)
>>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: device [8086:0b26] error
>>> status/mask=00000080/00002000
>>> pcieport 0000:09:04.0: [ 7] BadDLLP
>>>
>>> Calling aer_remove() during shutdown can quiesce the error message,
>>> however the spurious wakeup still happens.
>>>
>>> The issue won't happen if the device is in D3 before system shutdown, so
>>> putting device to low power state before shutdown to solve the issue.
>>>
>>> I don't have a sniffer so this is purely guesswork, however I believe
>>> putting device to low power state it's the right thing to do.
>>
>> My objection here is that we don't have an explanation of why this
>> should matter or a pointer to any spec language about this situation,
>> so it feels a little bit random.
>>
>> I suppose the problem wouldn't happen if AER interrupts were disabled?
>> We already do disable them in aer_suspend(), but maybe that's not used
>> in the shutdown path?
>>
>> My understanding is that .shutdown() should turn off device interrupts
>> and stop DMA. So maybe we need an aer_shutdown() that disables
>> interrupts?
>>
>
> IMO I see this commit as two problems with the same solution.
>
> I don't doubt that cleaning up AER interrupts in the shutdown path would
> help AER messages, but you really don't "want" devices to be in D0 when
> the system is "off" because even if the system is off some rails are
> still active and the device might still be powered.
>
> A powered device could cause interrupts (IE a spurious wakeup).
It's a bit of a stretch, but ACPI 7.4.2.5 and 7.4.2.6 are the closest
corollary to a spec I can find.
"Devices states are compatible with the current Power Resource states.
In other words, all devices are in the D3 state when the system state is
S4."
https://uefi.org/htmlspecs/ACPI_Spec_6_4_html/07_Power_and_Performance_Mgmt/oem-supplied-system-level-control-methods.html
>
>>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219036
>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>> index af2996d0d17f..4c6f66f3eb54 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>> @@ -510,6 +510,14 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>>> if (drv && drv->shutdown)
>>> drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
>>> + /*
>>> + * If driver already changed device's power state, it can mean the
>>> + * wakeup setting is in place, or a workaround is used. Hence
>>> keep it
>>> + * as is.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!kexec_in_progress && pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
>>> + pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * If this is a kexec reboot, turn off Bus Master bit on the
>>> * device to tell it to not continue to do DMA. Don't touch
>>> --
>>> 2.43.0
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-11 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 6:24 Kai-Heng Feng
2024-07-12 14:59 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-22 19:28 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-08-26 12:03 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-11 14:08 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-11 19:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-11 19:16 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-11 19:38 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-09-12 7:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 13:10 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-10-04 4:33 ` Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)
2024-10-04 9:26 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 3:00 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-12 16:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-09-13 6:00 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2024-09-13 8:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-09-13 20:33 ` Mario Limonciello
2024-09-15 7:14 ` Mika Westerberg
2024-10-09 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-10-10 4:52 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa504022-acb3-4930-b6b8-87a8dcb912c3@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®