From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: "Hervé Boisse" <admin@netgeek.ovh>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net/af_packet: fix tx skb network header on SOCK_RAW sockets over VLAN device
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:48:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa5895ae62e0f9c1eb8f662295ca920d1da7e88f.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230110191725.22675-2-admin@netgeek.ovh>
Hello,
On Tue, 2023-01-10 at 20:17 +0100, Hervé Boisse wrote:
> When an application sends a packet on a SOCK_RAW socket over a VLAN device,
> there is a possibility that the skb network header is incorrectly set.
>
> The issue happens when the device used to send the packet is a VLAN device
> whose underlying device has no VLAN tx hardware offloading support.
> In that case, the VLAN driver reports a LL header size increased by 4 bytes
> to take into account the tag that will be added in software.
>
> However, the socket user has no clue about that and still provides a normal
> LL header without tag.
> This results in the network header of the skb being shifted 4 bytes too far
> in the packet. This shift makes tc classifiers fail as they point to
> incorrect data.
I'm unsure I read correctly the use case: teh user-space application is
providing an L2 header and is expecting the Linux stack to add a vlan
tag? Or the linux application is sending packets on top of a vlan
device and desire no tag on the egress packet? or something else?
(Note: I think that in the fisrt 2 cases above the fix belong to the
user-space application).
Thanks!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-10 19:17 [PATCH net 1/2] net/af_packet: fix tx skb protocol on SOCK_PACKET sockets Hervé Boisse
2023-01-10 19:17 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net/af_packet: fix tx skb network header on SOCK_RAW sockets over VLAN device Hervé Boisse
2023-01-12 12:48 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2023-01-12 15:27 ` =?unknown-8bit?B?SGVydsOp?= Boisse
2023-01-12 15:47 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-01-12 16:22 ` Hervé Boisse
2023-01-12 18:38 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-01-12 16:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-01-12 15:48 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net/af_packet: fix tx skb protocol on SOCK_PACKET sockets Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa5895ae62e0f9c1eb8f662295ca920d1da7e88f.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=admin@netgeek.ovh \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®