From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754542AbXF3GPH (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:15:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751468AbXF3GO4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:14:56 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]:7647 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751421AbXF3GOz (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:14:55 -0400 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:14:55 -0400 From: "Grant Likely" To: "Akinobu Mita" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eberhard Moenkeberg" , "Joe Thornber" , "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] void unregister_blkdev - delete redundant messages In-Reply-To: <20070630031212.GD4045@APFDCB5C> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070630031013.GC4045@APFDCB5C> <20070630031212.GD4045@APFDCB5C> X-Google-Sender-Auth: de5ec85823b6e512 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/29/07, Akinobu Mita wrote: > No need to warn unregister_blkdev() failure by the callers. > (The previous patch makes unregister_blkdev() print error message in > error case) Seeing as none of the callers check the error code; why does the function return anything at all? g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. grant.likely@secretlab.ca (403) 399-0195