From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752905Ab0CTRf5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:35:57 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:60240 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752692Ab0CTRf4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:35:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B98F32D.8020906@monstr.eu> References: <4B98F32D.8020906@monstr.eu> From: Grant Likely Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:35:36 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 031006a9ebf7da82 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arch/microblaze fixes for 2.6.34-rc2 To: monstr@monstr.eu Cc: Linus Torvalds , LKML , John Williams , devicetree-discuss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Linus, > > Please pull Microblaze changes to your tree. There is support for PCI and > new DMA interface. > > Thanks, > Michal Hi Michal. I'm really unimpressed that you've merged the cloned PCI support code when we talked about merging the common powerpc & microblaze bits /before/ pushing it up to mainline. At the very least I would have expected a reply back from you telling me that you disagree and that you wanted to merge anyway. I didn't even get a reply back form you when I asked about why the PCI bits were in your linux-next branch. Now it needs to be merged in-place which is a lot more work. g.