From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
To: Yicong Yang <yang.yicong@picoheart.com>
Cc: <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
<linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
<geshijian@picoheart.com>, <yangyang.8776@picoheart.com>,
<yanligen@picoheart.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] serial: 8250_dw: Prefer SRBR in bogus RX timeout workaround if available
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 19:03:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa69c45a-3d14-4f48-b54f-bfce7d04c49d@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab256e4a-a9cc-410e-b889-f75fb01e77c7@picoheart.com>
On 9/17/2026 6:36 PM, Yicong Yang wrote:
> On 9/17/26 6:47 PM, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>> Hi Yicong,
>>
>> On 9/8/2026 7:45 PM, Yicong Yang wrote:
>>> The DW uart could get into the cases where a bogus RX timeout
>>> interrupt is asserted but no available data. This could be
>>> workaround by doing a bogus read.
>>>
>>> Currently the driver's using the standard RBR (receive buffer
>>> register) for this bogus read. However the reading of RBR
>>> in this case is allowed to raise a hardware error if vendor
>>> choose to implement in this way (our platform). It's also
>>> allowed to do the bogus read using SRBR (shadow RBR) for
>>> workaround which won't raise the hardware error. So change
>>> to use the SRBR to workaround the issue if it's available.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. If I understand correctly, the IP you are using
>> does not allow reading an empty FIFO, so you decided to read the SRBR
>> instead.
>
> yes but under certain condition, see blow.
>
>>
>> Does this same case applies when you open a port without any data in the
>> FIFO:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.3-rc3/source/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c#L710
>> ?
>>
>> If yes then I am wondering, how the condition mentioned above is bypassed
>
> reading an empty FIFO (by RBR) will be fine when the fifo is disabled.
> so I think serial8250_clear_interrupts() you referred is always invoked
> when the FIFO is disabled.
>
> I also find a similar issue related to serial8250_clear_interrupts()
> that trigger the PSLVERR when reading the empty FIFO when the FIFO
> is enabled. this is fixed by 7f8fdd4dbffc ("serial: 8250: fix panic due to PSLVERR")
>
Thanks for details, so now you are making sure, while at this empty read
fifo is disabled.
> thanks.
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Udit
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yang.yicong@picoheart.com>
>>> ---
>>> Change since v1:
>>> - refine the comments and type per Andy
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20260907074035.77796-1-yang.yicong@picoheart.com/
>>>
>>> Change since v1:
>>> - simply the workaround path per Ilpo and Andy
>>> - run ~48k reboot tests and didn't reproduce the issue
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/20260629075510.32854-1-yang.yicong@picoheart.com/
>>>
>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.c | 5 +++++
>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.h | 5 +++++
>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
>>> index 51d026f20825..b8a0bca8b536 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
>>> @@ -439,8 +439,15 @@ static int dw8250_handle_irq(struct uart_port *p)
>>> if (!up->dma && rx_timeout) {
>>> status = serial_lsr_in(up);
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Do the bogus read from Shadow RBR (SRBR) if provided.
>>> + * Both RBR and SRBR are supported ways to workaround
>>> + * this problem. But read RBR can cause hardware error
>>> + * (PSLVERR) if hardware choose to implement in this way
>>> + * (implement REG_TIMEOUT_WIDTH to 0), whereas SRBR won't.
>>> + */
>>> if (!(status & (UART_LSR_DR | UART_LSR_BI)))
>>> - serial_port_in(p, UART_RX);
>>> + serial_port_in(p, d->data.srbr);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* Manually stop the Rx DMA transfer when acting as flow controller */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.c
>>> index 8859e66d2d71..9bb02a4ab11f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.c
>>> @@ -247,5 +247,10 @@ void dw8250_setup_port(struct uart_port *p)
>>>
>>> if (reg & DW_UART_CPR_SIR_MODE)
>>> up->capabilities |= UART_CAP_IRDA;
>>> +
>>> + if (reg & DW_UART_CPR_SHADOW)
>>> + pd->srbr = DW_UART_SRBR_0;
>>> + else
>>> + pd->srbr = UART_RX;
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw8250_setup_port);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.h
>>> index 1fe52332e774..ee7a07fac0f6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dwlib.h
>>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>> #include "8250.h"
>>>
>>> /* Offsets for the DesignWare specific registers */
>>> +#define DW_UART_SRBR_0 0x0c /* Shadow Receive Buffer Register */
>>> #define DW_UART_USR 0x1f /* UART Status Register */
>>> #define DW_UART_DMASA 0xa8 /* DMA Software Ack */
>>> #define DW_UART_TCR 0xac /* Transceiver Control Register (RS485) */
>>> @@ -90,6 +91,10 @@ struct dw8250_port_data {
>>>
>>> /* RS485 variables */
>>> bool hw_rs485_support;
>>> +
>>> + /* Register offsets */
>>> + /* Shadow RBR (if not defined RBR will be used) */
>>> + int srbr;
>>> };
>>>
>>> void dw8250_do_set_termios(struct uart_port *p, struct ktermios *termios, const struct ktermios *old);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 14:15 Yicong Yang
2026-09-08 15:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-09-17 10:47 ` Kumar, Udit
2026-09-17 13:06 ` Yicong Yang
2026-09-17 13:33 ` Kumar, Udit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa69c45a-3d14-4f48-b54f-bfce7d04c49d@ti.com \
--to=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=geshijian@picoheart.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yang.yicong@picoheart.com \
--cc=yangyang.8776@picoheart.com \
--cc=yanligen@picoheart.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®