mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] driver core: Postpone DMA tear-down until after devres release
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:55:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa781547-7fa8-cb1a-50bd-d18351c02afd@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208164019.GY32526@8bytes.org>

On 08/02/2019 16:40, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> index 8ac10af17c0043a3..d62487d024559620 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
>> @@ -968,9 +968,9 @@ static void __device_release_driver(struct device *dev, struct device *parent)
>>   			drv->remove(dev);
>>   
>>   		device_links_driver_cleanup(dev);
>> -		arch_teardown_dma_ops(dev);
>>   
>>   		devres_release_all(dev);
>> +		arch_teardown_dma_ops(dev);
>>   		dev->driver = NULL;
>>   		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
>>   		if (dev->pm_domain && dev->pm_domain->dismiss)
> 
> Thanks for the fix! Should it also be tagged for stable and get a Fixes
> tag? I know it only triggers with a fix in v5.0-rc, but still...

I think so:

Fixes: 09515ef5ddad ("of/acpi: Configure dma operations at probe time 
for platform/amba/pci bus devices")

There aren't many drivers using dmam_alloc_*(), let alone which would 
also find themselves behind an IOMMU on an Arm system, but it turns out 
I actually have another one which can reproduce the BUG() with 5.0-rc.

I've tried a 4.12 kernel with a bit of instrumentation[1] and sure 
enough the devres-managed buffer is freed with the wrong ops[2] even 
then. How it manages not to blow up more catastrophically I have no 
idea... I guess at best it just leaks the buffers and IOMMU mappings, 
and at worst quietly frees random other pages instead.

Robin.

--------------
[1]

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
index 4f3eecedca2d..f4dbaa5598e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h
@@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static inline void *dma_alloc_attrs(struct device 
*dev, size_t size,
  		return NULL;

  	cpu_addr = ops->alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, flag, attrs);
+	dev_info(dev, "alloc %lx %lx\n", (unsigned long)cpu_addr, (unsigned 
long)ops);
  	debug_dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, *dma_handle, cpu_addr);
  	return cpu_addr;
  }
@@ -512,6 +513,7 @@ static inline void dma_free_attrs(struct device 
*dev, size_t size,

  	debug_dma_free_coherent(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle);
  	ops->free(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle, attrs);
+	dev_info(dev, "free %lx %lx\n", (unsigned long)cpu_addr, (unsigned 
long)ops);
  }

  static inline void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,

-------------
[2]

/ # echo '0000:03:00.0' > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/sata_sil24/bind
[  107.417252] sata_sil24 0000:03:00.0: alloc ffff00000a6f9000 
ffff0000089b8090
[  107.424397] sata_sil24 0000:03:00.0: alloc ffff00000a719000 
ffff0000089b8090
[  107.432216] scsi host0: sata_sil24
[  107.436134] scsi host1: sata_sil24
[  107.439853] ata7: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0x50084000 port 
0x50080000 irq 51
[  107.447228] ata8: SATA max UDMA/100 host m128@0x50084000 port 
0x50082000 irq 51
/ # echo '0000:03:00.0' > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/sata_sil24/unbind
...
[  112.048654] sata_sil24 0000:03:00.0: free ffff00000a719000 
ffff0000089b8120
[  112.055579] sata_sil24 0000:03:00.0: free ffff00000a6f9000 
ffff0000089b8120

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-08 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-07 19:36 Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-08  7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-08  9:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-08 11:34 ` Robin Murphy
2019-02-08 16:40 ` Joerg Roedel
2019-02-08 17:55   ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-02-08 18:55     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-02-11 10:22       ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-07 14:45         ` John Garry
2019-03-07 14:52           ` Robin Murphy
2019-03-07 14:58             ` John Garry
2019-03-07 15:12             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-03-26 11:41 ` John Garry
2019-03-26 12:31   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-03-26 17:36     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa781547-7fa8-cb1a-50bd-d18351c02afd@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome