From: "Luke D. Jones" <luke@ljones.dev>
To: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@antheas.dev>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Kosina" <jikos@kernel.org>,
"Benjamin Tissoires" <bentiss@kernel.org>,
"Corentin Chary" <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] HID: asus: refactor init sequence per spec
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 13:10:40 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fac9f4d3-ed1d-4e20-b555-4b83434241a6@ljones.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGwozwG8nVOod4NTobc_8U-V9WqeZQPGwF9NO7Tjjo_DWu_3qg@mail.gmail.com>
On 23/03/25 12:54, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 00:53, Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@antheas.dev> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025 at 00:29, Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23/03/25 12:05, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 23:01, Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22/03/25 23:27, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
>>>>>> Currently, asus_kbd_init() uses a reverse engineered init sequence
>>>>>> from Windows, which contains the handshakes from multiple programs.
>>>>>> Keep the main one, which is 0x5a (meant for brightness drivers).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition, perform a get_response and check if the response is the
>>>>>> same. To avoid regressions, print an error if the response does not
>>>>>> match instead of rejecting device.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then, refactor asus_kbd_get_functions() to use the same ID it is called
>>>>>> with, instead of hardcoding it to 0x5a so that it may be used for 0x0d
>>>>>> in the future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Antheas Kapenekakis <lkml@antheas.dev>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/hid/hid-asus.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-asus.c b/drivers/hid/hid-asus.c
>>>>>> index 46e3e42f9eb5f..8d4df1b6f143b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-asus.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-asus.c
>>>>>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Asus HID Keyboard and TouchPad");
>>>>>> #define FEATURE_REPORT_ID 0x0d
>>>>>> #define INPUT_REPORT_ID 0x5d
>>>>>> #define FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID 0x5a
>>>>>> -#define FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_SIZE 16
>>>>>> +#define FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_SIZE 64
>>>>>> #define FEATURE_KBD_LED_REPORT_ID1 0x5d
>>>>>> #define FEATURE_KBD_LED_REPORT_ID2 0x5e
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -388,14 +388,41 @@ static int asus_kbd_set_report(struct hid_device *hdev, const u8 *buf, size_t bu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static int asus_kbd_init(struct hid_device *hdev, u8 report_id)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - const u8 buf[] = { report_id, 0x41, 0x53, 0x55, 0x53, 0x20, 0x54,
>>>>>> - 0x65, 0x63, 0x68, 0x2e, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x63, 0x2e, 0x00 };
>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>> + * Asus handshake identifying us as a driver (0x5A)
>>>>>> + * 0x5A then ASCII for "ASUS Tech.Inc."
>>>>>> + * 0x5D is for userspace Windows applications.
>>>>>> + *
>>>>>> + * The handshake is first sent as a set_report, then retrieved
>>>>>> + * from a get_report to verify the response.
>>>>>> + */
>>>>>
>>>>> This entire comment is not required, especially not the last paragraph.
>>>>> From what I've seen in .dll reversing attempts there's no real
>>>>> distinction from driver/app and it's simply an init/enable sequence
>>>>> common to almost every ITE MCU that ASUS have used (slash, anime, Ally).
>>>>>
>>>>> Please remove.
>>>>
>>>> It is a context comment but can be removed.
>>>>
>>>>>> + const u8 buf[] = { report_id, 0x41, 0x53, 0x55, 0x53, 0x20,
>>>>>> + 0x54, 0x65, 0x63, 0x68, 0x2e, 0x49, 0x6e, 0x63, 0x2e, 0x00 };
>>>>>> + u8 *readbuf;
>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ret = asus_kbd_set_report(hdev, buf, sizeof(buf));
>>>>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> - hid_err(hdev, "Asus failed to send init command: %d\n", ret);
>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>>>> + hid_err(hdev, "Asus failed to send handshake: %d\n", ret);
>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + readbuf = kzalloc(FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>> + if (!readbuf)
>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + ret = hid_hw_raw_request(hdev, report_id, readbuf,
>>>>>> + FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_SIZE, HID_FEATURE_REPORT,
>>>>>> + HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
>>>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>>>> + hid_err(hdev, "Asus failed to receive handshake ack: %d\n", ret);
>>>>>> + } else if (memcmp(readbuf, buf, sizeof(buf)) != 0) {
>>>>>> + hid_err(hdev, "Asus handshake returned invalid response: %*ph\n",
>>>>>> + FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_SIZE, readbuf);
>>>>>> + // Do not return error if handshake is wrong to avoid regressions
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + kfree(readbuf);
>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -417,7 +444,7 @@ static int asus_kbd_get_functions(struct hid_device *hdev,
>>>>>> if (!readbuf)
>>>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - ret = hid_hw_raw_request(hdev, FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID, readbuf,
>>>>>> + ret = hid_hw_raw_request(hdev, report_id, readbuf,
>>>>>> FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_SIZE, HID_FEATURE_REPORT,
>>>>>> HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
>>>>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>>>>> @@ -540,42 +567,25 @@ static int asus_kbd_register_leds(struct hid_device *hdev)
>>>>>> unsigned char kbd_func;
>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (drvdata->quirks & QUIRK_ROG_NKEY_KEYBOARD) {
>>>>>> - /* Initialize keyboard */
>>>>>> - ret = asus_kbd_init(hdev, FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID);
>>>>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - /* The LED endpoint is initialised in two HID */
>>>>>> - ret = asus_kbd_init(hdev, FEATURE_KBD_LED_REPORT_ID1);
>>>>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - ret = asus_kbd_init(hdev, FEATURE_KBD_LED_REPORT_ID2);
>>>>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> + ret = asus_kbd_init(hdev, FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID);
>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have any non-ROG equipment to test. There have been some cases
>>>>> of Vivobook using the same MCU, but these otherwise used something else.
>>>>> And the oldest hardware I have uses a 0x1866, which uses the same init
>>>>> sequence but works with both 0x5A and 0x5D report ID for init (on same
>>>>> endpoint). There are instances of other laptops that accept both 0x5A
>>>>> and 0x5D, and some that have only 0x5D.
>>>>
>>>> The driver sets the brightness using 0x5a and accepts keyboard
>>>> shortcuts only from 0x5a. Therefore it needs to init only with 0x5a.
>>>>
>>>> How would those laptops regress and in what way?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The media keys fail to work (vol, mic, rog). Can you please accept that
>>> I do know some laptops used only 0x5D, and these are older models,
>>> around 5+ years. The only thing I have to go on is my memory
>>> unfortunately, and I've been trying to find the concrete examples.
>>
>> I just looked at the history. Yeah it seems you added ID1 in 2020 with
>> some other commands. But on the same commit you blocked 0x5d and 0x5e,
>> so it means those keyboards use 0x5a to send keyboard events.
>>
>> Nevertheless, it is not worth looking up or risking regressions for
>> old hardware. I will readd 0x5d, 0x5e for
>> USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUSTEK_ROG_NKEY_KEYBOARD and
>> USB_DEVICE_ID_ASUSTEK_ROG_NKEY_KEYBOARD2, since those are the ones you
>> added the inits with.
>>
>> But I will still keep them off for the Z13 and Ally.
>>
>> By the way,
>
> I guess I did not finish this. I was going to express some concern
> about the Claymore keyboard. But it seems it does not have a backlight
> quirk so it is ok
>
The external keyboards are a bit funky yeah. I don't think the Claymore
is in very wide use at all either. In any case you're correct.
>> Antheas
>>
>>>>> I think you will need to change this to try both 0x5A and 0x5D sorry.
>>>>> The older models using 0x1854, 0x1869, 0x1866 PID may regress and
>>>>> although I'm reasonably confident there won't be issues due to age of
>>>>> those, it's not a risk I'm willing to take, I've spent all morning
>>>>> trawling through archives of info and I can't actually verify this other
>>>>> than from my memory.
>>>>
>>>> For devices that support RGB, only when RGB is set, 0x5D is initialized too.
>>>
>>> Sure. But as I've said above.. Please add both to init. It's only done
>>> once, and it doesn't hurt anything plus doesn't risk regressing older
>>> hardware.
>>>
>>> If I can get the proper evidence that only 0x5A is required I'm happy to
>>> use only that, but until then I don't want that risk. And it's only a
>>> small thing here.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Luke.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I mentioned 0x5E being used for some of the oddball devices like slash
>>>>> and anime, don't worry about that one, it's a bridge that can be crossed
>>>>> at a later time. But it does illustrate that other report ID have been
>>>>> used for init.
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise the cleanup is good.
>>>>>
>>>>> No other comments required and I'll sign off with the above corrections.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Luke
>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_FAMILY, "ProArt P16")) {
>>>>>> - ret = asus_kbd_disable_oobe(hdev);
>>>>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> - } else {
>>>>>> - /* Initialize keyboard */
>>>>>> - ret = asus_kbd_init(hdev, FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID);
>>>>>> - if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>>> + /* Get keyboard functions */
>>>>>> + ret = asus_kbd_get_functions(hdev, &kbd_func, FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID);
>>>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - /* Get keyboard functions */
>>>>>> - ret = asus_kbd_get_functions(hdev, &kbd_func, FEATURE_KBD_REPORT_ID);
>>>>>> + if (dmi_match(DMI_PRODUCT_FAMILY, "ProArt P16")) {
>>>>>> + ret = asus_kbd_disable_oobe(hdev);
>>>>>> if (ret < 0)
>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> - /* Check for backlight support */
>>>>>> - if (!(kbd_func & SUPPORT_KBD_BACKLIGHT))
>>>>>> - return -ENODEV;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* Check for backlight support */
>>>>>> + if (!(kbd_func & SUPPORT_KBD_BACKLIGHT))
>>>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> drvdata->kbd_backlight = devm_kzalloc(&hdev->dev,
>>>>>> sizeof(struct asus_kbd_leds),
>>>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>
>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-23 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-22 10:27 [PATCH v3 00/10] HID: asus: Add RGB Support to Asus Z13, Ally, unify backlight asus-wmi, and Z13 QOL Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] HID: asus: refactor init sequence per spec Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 22:01 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 23:05 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 23:28 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 23:53 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 23:54 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 0:10 ` Luke D. Jones [this message]
2025-03-23 0:14 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] HID: asus: prevent binding to all HID devices on ROG Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 23:21 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] HID: Asus: add Z13 folio to generic group for multitouch to work Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 23:30 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 23:32 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Add support for multiple kbd RGB handlers Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 0:02 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-24 11:31 ` Hans de Goede
2025-03-24 12:29 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-24 12:37 ` Hans de Goede
2025-03-22 10:27 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] HID: asus: listen to the asus-wmi brightness device instead of creating one Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 6:40 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] platform/x86: asus-wmi: remove unused keyboard backlight quirk Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 0:05 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] platform/x86: asus-wmi: add keyboard brightness event handler Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 0:06 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] HID: asus: add support for the asus-wmi brightness handler Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 0:08 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-22 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] HID: asus: add basic RGB support Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 6:21 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-23 6:40 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-23 11:37 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 14:45 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 20:13 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-23 20:39 ` Luke D. Jones
2025-03-23 21:08 ` Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-22 10:28 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] HID: asus: add RGB support to the ROG Ally units Antheas Kapenekakis
2025-03-23 6:29 ` Luke D. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fac9f4d3-ed1d-4e20-b555-4b83434241a6@ljones.dev \
--to=luke@ljones.dev \
--cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
--cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@antheas.dev \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®