From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753543AbeDRIbT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 04:31:19 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:60828 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164AbeDRIbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 04:31:16 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] KVM: s390: enable/disable AP interpretive execution To: Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, buendgen@de.ibm.com Cc: freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1523827345-11600-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1523827345-11600-6-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <15b60572-40d6-0f03-11f9-c50cb7eb00e8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <6cba35df-b0de-8000-bb39-c4cec8622c57@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <2b053349-071e-17ed-6ebd-a37bcfd2f330@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <0d18aeef-dfe7-89b6-f91e-022a71fb5ed9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:31:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0d18aeef-dfe7-89b6-f91e-022a71fb5ed9@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18041808-0044-0000-0000-000005497EA5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18041808-0045-0000-0000-0000288991CA Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-04-18_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1804180080 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17/04/2018 20:11, Tony Krowiak wrote: > On 04/17/2018 12:55 PM, Pierre Morel wrote: >> On 17/04/2018 18:22, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>> On 04/17/2018 12:13 PM, Pierre Morel wrote: >>>> On 17/04/2018 17:02, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>>> On 04/16/2018 06:51 AM, Pierre Morel wrote: >>>>>> On 15/04/2018 23:22, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>>>>> The VFIO AP device model exploits interpretive execution of AP >>>>>>> instructions (APIE) to provide guests passthrough access to AP >>>>>>> devices. This patch introduces a new interface to enable and >>>>>>> disable APIE. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>   arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h   |   16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>   arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 + >>>>>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c           |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |    9 +++++++++ >>>>>>>   4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h >>>>>>> b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h >>>>>>> index 736e93e..a6c092e 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm-ap.h >>>>>>> @@ -35,4 +35,20 @@ >>>>>>>    */ >>>>>>>   void kvm_ap_build_crycbd(struct kvm *kvm); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +/** >>>>>>> + * kvm_ap_interpret_instructions >>>>>>> + * >>>>>>> + * Indicate whether AP instructions shall be interpreted. If >>>>>>> they are not >>>>>>> + * interpreted, all AP instructions will be intercepted and >>>>>>> routed back to >>>>>>> + * userspace. >>>>>>> + * >>>>>>> + * @kvm: the virtual machine attributes >>>>>>> + * @enable: indicates whether AP instructions are to be >>>>>>> interpreted (true) or >>>>>>> + *        or not (false). >>>>>>> + * >>>>>>> + * Returns 0 if completed successfully; otherwise, returns >>>>>>> -EOPNOTSUPP >>>>>>> + * indicating that AP instructions are not installed on the guest. >>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>> +int kvm_ap_interpret_instructions(struct kvm *kvm, bool enable); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>>   #endif /* _ASM_KVM_AP */ >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>>>>> b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>>>>> index 3162783..5470685 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h >>>>>>> @@ -715,6 +715,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_crypto { >>>>>>>       __u32 crycbd; >>>>>>>       __u8 aes_kw; >>>>>>>       __u8 dea_kw; >>>>>>> +    __u8 apie; >>>>>>>   }; >>>>>>> >>>>>>>   #define APCB0_MASK_SIZE 1 >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c >>>>>>> index 991bae4..55d11b5 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-ap.c >>>>>>> @@ -58,3 +58,23 @@ void kvm_ap_build_crycbd(struct kvm *kvm) >>>>>>>       } >>>>>>>   } >>>>>>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_build_crycbd); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +int kvm_ap_interpret_instructions(struct kvm *kvm, bool enable) >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>> +    int ret = 0; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +    mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +    if (!test_kvm_cpu_feat(kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP)) { >>>>>> >>>>>> Do we really need to test CPU_FEAT_AP? >>>>> >>>>> Yes we do. >>>> >>>> really? why? >>> >>> The KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP will not be enabled by KVM if the AP >>> instructions are not installed on the host. I assume - but have >>> no way of verifying - that if the AP instructions are not installed >>> on the host, that interpretation would fail. Do you know what would >>> happen if AP instructions are interpreted when not installed on >>> the host? >> >> If the host has no AP instructions (his ECA.28=0) but it set ECA.28 >> for a guest, >> there will be no AP instructions available in the guest. > > Then there's the answer to your question; this is why we to test > CPU_FEAT_AP. We can postpone this discussion when we discuss on VSIE. For this specific call I just wanted to point out that obviously this function should not be called if the guest has no AP instructions. > >> >> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I understand that KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP means AP instructions >>>>>> are interpreted. >>>>>> shouldn't we add this information in the name? >>>>>> like KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_APIE >>>>> >>>>> KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP does NOT mean AP instructions are >>>>> interpreted, it means >>>>> AP instructions are installed. >>>> >>>> Right same error I made all along this review. >>>> But AFAIK it means AP instructions are provided to the guest. >>>> Then should this function be called if the guest has no AP >>>> instructions ? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> +        ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; >>>>>>> +        goto done; >>>>>>> +    } >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +    kvm->arch.crypto.apie = enable; >>>>>>> +    kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_reset_all(kvm); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> +done: >>>>>>> +    mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); >>>>>>> +    return ret; >>>>>>> +} >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kvm_ap_interpret_instructions); >>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >>>>>>> index 55cd897..1dc8566 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >>>>>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >>>>>>> @@ -1901,6 +1901,9 @@ static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct >>>>>>> kvm *kvm) >>>>>>>       kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb; >>>>>>>       kvm_ap_build_crycbd(kvm); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +    /* Default setting indicating SIE shall interpret AP >>>>>>> instructions */ >>>>>>> +    kvm->arch.crypto.apie = 1; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>>       if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76)) >>>>>>>           return; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @@ -2434,6 +2437,12 @@ static void >>>>>>> kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>>>>>>   { >>>>>>>       vcpu->arch.sie_block->crycbd = vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +    vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca &= ~ECA_APIE; >>>>>>> +    if (vcpu->kvm->arch.crypto.apie && >>>>>>> +        test_kvm_cpu_feat(vcpu->kvm, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP)) >>>>>> >>>>>> Do we call xxx_crypto_setup() if KVM does not support AP >>>>>> interpretation? >>>>> >>>>> Yes, kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(vcpu) is called by >>>>> kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(vcpu) >>>>> as well as from kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_reset_all(kvm). Calling it >>>>> has nothing >>>>> to do with whether AP interpretation is supported or not as it >>>>> does much >>>>> more than that, including setting up of wrapping keys and the CRYCBD. >>>> >>>> Sorry, still the same error I made about CPU_FEAT_AP meaning AP >>>> instructions in the guest >>>> and not AP interpretation available. >>>> Could apie be set if AP instruction are not supported? >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_APIE; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + >>>>>>>       if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76)) >>>>>>>           return; >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany