From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932498AbdJ3KEA (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 06:04:00 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:57117 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932315AbdJ3KD5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 06:03:57 -0400 Subject: Re: drm/rcar-du: Use common error handling code in rcar_du_encoders_init() To: Jani Nikula , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Laurent Pinchart , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Sean Paul , Daniel Vetter References: <7d5e68c7-2d64-0131-1a08-eeb4e03cc113@users.sourceforge.net> <9fafa688-f699-c587-ef77-840efa71bf76@users.sourceforge.net> <87tvyke8g2.fsf@intel.com> <1864580.oVLIQZJ4NS@avalon> <87d155gdyw.fsf@intel.com> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:03:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d155gdyw.fsf@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PHchQyHTsvXnQph+RMBzw5YXK3e6294Sk/iPM4zx/47CMfWNCWq wB0BUIgR0MandzMYxSpmrCCIjsubva/hVH2N6HVIkc6CzdjjCAZLogW+/6tlud2b8TvXZ/U iyLZE90ns3qth9l0sudp0mQe+ceKuUsLDPCeDiWFkDVHoypJaPxAEr6LJGBrpy2VbWnmqJS Poy9tw3LuEFKOVI+vERzA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Vp/0ezwMC5Y=:g7nW3Rms7eIM6MDwO2zAJz zgNkV2WDTzSV8YOEhui+QLKnT7VA/nZtl09jvGxYD1TKo2nhoGPewcy/sKkkd/lXEJ/O8kI87 5P1WSg6Bh+Pqrpv0q46h1+9RYU9V3tt6kH1t+rwkrkzi3QBEOQBqlx9cGUJcZ766oT5EfmHcW Idt1S5fyHHzvA21iq35INCmHtZ7bRK4t7vzEBRxGZE3c1flqzVrIRp2iSGtbuv4jNmHedKUPp lAHK5yJboULvMi39GKZ83zXI1F+fHXu06M+KTxnKHqf+uyqLDOjbSQOgaShZR5KReUItIlaIQ XdrJkW6mumb+7DxrVFPYHxJLc+ztkO80T+h7h8myy09QEm9gW0ntgVkYgf71ZeW9SeeMifboz kzmxV23E5xySty8pnu+f8fpWabFra7PpxUYLzEFvVs2QlMPsET1ZqLYL+R1B/cUa6iZ6CshMC na0czEEuG9Q+fkZzFH2Ywz/sYIwYezhRzvI1TcmQi6QAHdqT3QmrzDr6CUyBz9Flr4mSTpDYC 3qVrxE//cpVcYZvsClkG/rqA3ApZnu/kySJcTADuKli0nBOD8fudAphPt5xmyuWmEA2ZVzkl5 3Dp1L771Mzpv0uIfl00gy8RexDu92swdwlUNXyspOBTZslvqUj6AncXCngT1Oz2OK4l+nckZU rYwALj72BS08QEn6YJUrXvpZhl0TzWQrBwHlguYLokHexs45otuBdH/3w7xZ+aZ4VSPHQ5+yI Tun6sTilzRRTOfgWfSI7ry2ozclerziDUht9MGZMdm8ef6/ETXQG5JIvCCEYr2V//xqSGdv+n 1rWlaAbnoqjlq9JD5/tvfzTVJ4dT6FkfdWuaoJHCFyLocCrS9c= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > In general, I'll pick up any patches that are good, This is usual. > but the current track record is that Markus' patches need extra scrutiny, I find that this can be fine according to a safe review for presented update suggestions. > and many of the patches contain subjective changes that lead to debate Some discussion is occasionally needed to achieve the desired change acceptance, isn't it? > that is not constructive. I got an other opinion here. > There's no return on investment here. I hope that the view can become more positive. How will the clarification evolve further? Regards, Markus