From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com, tinghao.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/8] perf/x86: Add PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK flag
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 16:19:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb1ebf48-ac2f-499a-b480-ba8474b12200@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZUlWuROfYcYJlRn4@kernel.org>
On 2023-11-06 4:12 p.m., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 01:16:20PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Currently, branch_sample_type !=0 is used to check whether a branch
>> stack setup is required. But it doesn't check the sample type,
>> unnecessary branch stack setup may be done for a counting event. E.g.,
>> perf record -e "{branch-instructions,branch-misses}:S" -j any
>> Also, the event only with the new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COUNTERS branch
>> sample type may not require a branch stack setup either.
>>
>> Add a new flag NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK to indicate whether the event requires
>> a branch stack setup. Replace the needs_branch_stack() by checking the
>> new flag.
>>
>> The counting event check is implemented here. The later patch will take
>> the new PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COUNTERS into account.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> No changes since V4
>
> So I saw this on tip/perf/urgent, I'm picking the tools bits then.
Thanks Arnaldo.
Ian has already reviewed the tool parts.
But I still owe a test case for the feature. I will post a patch later.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/acbb895a-475e-4679-98fc-6b90c05a00af@linux.intel.com/
Thanks,
Kan
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>> arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> index 41a164764a84..a99449c0d77c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
>> @@ -2527,9 +2527,14 @@ static void intel_pmu_assign_event(struct perf_event *event, int idx)
>> perf_report_aux_output_id(event, idx);
>> }
>>
>> +static __always_inline bool intel_pmu_needs_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> + return event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void intel_pmu_del_event(struct perf_event *event)
>> {
>> - if (needs_branch_stack(event))
>> + if (intel_pmu_needs_branch_stack(event))
>> intel_pmu_lbr_del(event);
>> if (event->attr.precise_ip)
>> intel_pmu_pebs_del(event);
>> @@ -2820,7 +2825,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_add_event(struct perf_event *event)
>> {
>> if (event->attr.precise_ip)
>> intel_pmu_pebs_add(event);
>> - if (needs_branch_stack(event))
>> + if (intel_pmu_needs_branch_stack(event))
>> intel_pmu_lbr_add(event);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3897,7 +3902,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
>> x86_pmu.pebs_aliases(event);
>> }
>>
>> - if (needs_branch_stack(event)) {
>> + if (needs_branch_stack(event) && is_sampling_event(event))
>> + event->hw.flags |= PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK;
>> +
>> + if (intel_pmu_needs_branch_stack(event)) {
>> ret = intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(event);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
>> index 1dc19b9b4426..a1685981c520 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event_flags.h
>> @@ -20,3 +20,4 @@ PERF_ARCH(TOPDOWN, 0x04000) /* Count Topdown slots/metrics events */
>> PERF_ARCH(PEBS_STLAT, 0x08000) /* st+stlat data address sampling */
>> PERF_ARCH(AMD_BRS, 0x10000) /* AMD Branch Sampling */
>> PERF_ARCH(PEBS_LAT_HYBRID, 0x20000) /* ld and st lat for hybrid */
>> +PERF_ARCH(NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK, 0x40000) /* require branch stack setup */
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-06 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-25 20:16 [PATCH V5 1/8] perf: Add branch stack counters kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 2/8] perf/x86: Add PERF_X86_EVENT_NEEDS_BRANCH_STACK flag kan.liang
2023-11-06 21:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-06 21:19 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2023-11-07 15:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-08 21:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-09 16:14 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-09 16:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-09 17:05 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-09 18:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-11-09 19:07 ` Liang, Kan
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 3/8] perf: Add branch_sample_call_stack kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Reorganize attrs and is_visible kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 5/8] perf/x86/intel: Support branch counters logging kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 6/8] tools headers UAPI: Sync include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h header with the kernel kan.liang
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 7/8] perf header: Support num and width of branch counters kan.liang
2023-10-26 2:10 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-25 20:16 ` [PATCH V5 8/8] perf tools: Add branch counter knob kan.liang
2023-10-26 2:12 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-26 18:28 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb1ebf48-ac2f-499a-b480-ba8474b12200@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tinghao.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®