From: "andrzej zaborowski" <balrogg@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Don't miss the ARM-scsi fix.
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 14:00:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb249edb0707040500o42e945afr9040cbd268942555@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070703193104.GA27542@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 03/07/07, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:21:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:03:56 -0400
> > Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> > > index ba58223..ca82901 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-versatile/pci.c
> > > @@ -117,7 +117,10 @@ static int versatile_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int wh
> > > } else {
> > > switch (size) {
> > > case 1:
> > > - v = __raw_readb(addr);
> > > + v = __raw_readl(addr);
> > > + if (where & 2) v >>= 16;
> > > + if (where & 1) v >>= 8;
> >
> > Someone's enter key broke?
>
> Probably, but I'd rather have the fix in than worry about that at this
> stage.
It's just the case of being consistent with the already broken style
in a function vs. correct style and inconsistency. I can never decide.
Regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-04 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-03 19:03 Rob Landley
2007-07-03 19:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-03 19:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2007-07-04 1:17 ` Rob Landley
2007-07-04 12:00 ` andrzej zaborowski [this message]
2007-07-04 17:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2007-07-03 21:45 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb249edb0707040500o42e945afr9040cbd268942555@mail.gmail.com \
--to=balrogg@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®