mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pci driver loads right after unload
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 12:50:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb4bb470-c30e-c173-3267-99e283f79e02@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180102192721.GB10273@kroah.com>

Hi Greg/Bjorn,

On 1/2/2018 9:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 01:00:03PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Greg, linux-kernel]
>>
>> Hi Max,
>>
>> Thanks for the report!
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 01:50:23AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>> I encountered a strange phenomena using 2 different pci drivers
>>> (nvme and mlx5_core) since 4.15-rc1:
>>> when I try to unload the modules using "modprobe -r" cmd it calls
>>> the .probe function right after calling the .remove function and the
>>> module is not realy unloaded.
>>> I think there is some race condition because when I added a
>>> msleep(1000) after "pci_unregister_driver(&nvme_driver);" (in the
>>> nvme module testing, it also worked in the mlx5_core), the issue
>>> seems to dissapear.
>>
>> You say "since 4.15-rc1".  Does that mean it's a regression?  If so,
>> what's the most recent kernel that does not have this problem?  Worst
>> case, you could bisect to find where it broke.
>>
>> I don't see anything obvious in the drivers/pci changes between v4.14
>> and v4.15-rc1.  Module loading and driver binding is mostly driven by
>> the driver core and udev.  Maybe you could learn something with
>> "udevadm monitor" or by turning on the some of the debug in
>> lib/kobject_uevent.c?
> 
> 
> This should be resolved in 4.15-rc6, there was a regression in -rc1 in
> this area when dealing with uevents over netlink.
> 
> Max, can you test -rc6 to verify if this is really fixed or not?

I've tested -rc6 and the issue doesn't repro.
I'll continue monitoring this scenario in -rc7.
Can you point to the commit that fixes the issue ? and I'll test the 
kernel with/without this patch.

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Cheers,
Max.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-03 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <13c000eb-5fbe-1787-54c0-d113500cf3db@mellanox.com>
2018-01-02 19:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-01-02 19:27   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-03 10:50     ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]
2018-01-03 11:18       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb4bb470-c30e-c173-3267-99e283f79e02@mellanox.com \
    --to=maxg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®