mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: LiamNioc <LiamNi-oc@zhaoxin.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, <LiamNi@zhaoxin.com>, <CobeChen@zhaoxin.com>,
	<LouisQi@zhaoxin.com>, <EwanHai@zhaoxin.com>,
	<FrankZhu@zhaoxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86:Cancel hrtimer in the process of saving PIT state to reduce the performance overhead caused by hrtimer during guest stop.
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 10:19:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb523153-5185-4ec3-941c-3abf1a6eeac8@zhaoxin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z-_xNpgsYDW0_4Jn@google.com>



On 2025/4/4 22:48, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> 
> 
> [这封邮件来自外部发件人 谨防风险]
> 
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025, LiamNioc wrote:
>> On 2025/3/17 21:38, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, Liam Ni wrote:
>>>> When using the dump-guest-memory command in QEMU to dump
>>>> the virtual machine's memory,the virtual machine will be
>>>> paused for a period of time.If the guest (i.e., UEFI) uses
>>>> the PIT as the system clock,it will be observed that the
>>>> HRTIMER used by the PIT continues to run during the guest
>>>> stop process, imposing an additional burden on the system.
>>>> Moreover, during the guest restart process,the previously
>>>> established HRTIMER will be canceled,and the accumulated
>>>> timer events will be flushed.However, before the old
>>>> HRTIMER is canceled,the accumulated timer events
>>>> will "surreptitiously" inject interrupts into the guest.
>>>>
>>>> SO during the process of saving the KVM PIT state,
>>>> the HRTIMER need to be canceled to reduce the performance overhead
>>>> caused by HRTIMER during the guest stop process.
>>>>
>>>> i.e. if guest
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Liam Ni <liamni-oc@zhaoxin.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> index 045c61cc7e54..75355b315aca 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>> @@ -6405,6 +6405,8 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_pit(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pit_state *ps)
>>>>
>>>>         mutex_lock(&kps->lock);
>>>>         memcpy(ps, &kps->channels, sizeof(*ps));
>>>> +     hrtimer_cancel(&kvm->arch.vpit->pit_state.timer);
>>>> +     kthread_flush_work(&kvm->arch.vpit->expired);
>>>
>>> KVM cannot assume userspace wants to stop the PIT when grabbing a snapshot.  It's
>>> a significant ABI change, and not desirable in all cases.
>>
>> When VM Pause, all devices of the virtual machine are frozen, so the PIT
>> freeze only saves the PIT device status, but does not cancel HRTIMER, but
>> chooses to cancel HRTIMER when VM resumes and refresh the pending task.
>> According to my observation, before refreshing the pending task, these
>> pending tasks will secretly inject interrupts into the guest.
>>
>> So do we need to cancel the HRTIMER when VM pause?
> 
> The problem is that KVM has no real concept of pausing a VM.  There are a variety
> of hacky hooks here and there, but no KVM-wide notion of "pause".
> 
> For this case, after getting PIT state, you should be able to use KVM_SET_PIT2 to
> set the mode of channel[0] to 0xff, which call destroy_pit_timer() via
> pit_load_count().

Got it.
so i need to modify the behavior of QEMU's code.





      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17  9:19 Liam Ni
2025-03-17 13:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-25  6:10   ` LiamNioc
2025-04-04 14:48     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-04-07  2:19       ` LiamNioc [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb523153-5185-4ec3-941c-3abf1a6eeac8@zhaoxin.com \
    --to=liamni-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=EwanHai@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=FrankZhu@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=LiamNi@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=LouisQi@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®