From: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [perf test] 658a8805cb: perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic_tests.fail
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 10:05:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb82c22e-e72d-4d0b-9e66-29e3975919a4@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cgDUQL82ToJN5kXJpdEm0aTEJmU1iuxCwSK5Vhi2jnpPQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/19/24 20:34, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 3:54 AM kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> kernel test robot noticed "perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic_tests.fail" on:
>>
>> commit: 658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e50012e3d1ed5e3 ("perf test: Speed up test case 70 annotate basic tests")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>>
>> [test failed on linux-next/master 6906a84c482f098d31486df8dc98cead21cce2d0]
>>
>> in testcase: perf-sanity-tests
>> version:
>> with following parameters:
>>
>> perf_compiler: gcc
>>
>>
>>
>> compiler: gcc-13
>> test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz (Skylake) with 32G memory
>>
>> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>>
>>
>> we didn't observed the issue on parent.
>>
>> f5803651b4a4b67d 658a8805cb604260ae9f35ae5e5
>> ---------------- ---------------------------
>> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
>> | | |
>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_annotate_basic_tests.fail
>
> Hmm.. strange. The only change in the commit is to save
> the output of perf annotate into a file. I'm not sure if it'd affect
> the test result. Maybe because of sanitizers..?
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
Apologies that this patches causes trouble.
I retried the patch again on my Intel virtual machine and it did succeed.
I do not know how to help to get this fixed. Please advise.
Thanks a lot
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
>> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>>
> --
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
--
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Wolfgang Wendt
Geschäftsführung: David Faller
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-20 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 7:53 kernel test robot
2024-06-19 18:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-06-20 8:05 ` Thomas Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb82c22e-e72d-4d0b-9e66-29e3975919a4@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome