From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] netfilter: cttimeout: remove VLA in ctnl_timeout_parse_policy
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 17:45:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb8c8194-ce51-828c-f8e9-52a1c7763caa@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180311222110.yk34o63ha5y34ssx@salvia>
On 03/11/2018 05:21 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 05:12:09PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Hi Pablo,
>>
>> On 03/11/2018 05:04 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 12:47:55PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>> In preparation to enabling -Wvla, remove VLA and replace it
>>>> with dynamic memory allocation.
>>>
>>> Looks good but...
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
>>>> index 95b0470..a2f7d92 100644
>>>> --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
>>>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
>>>> @@ -52,18 +52,26 @@ ctnl_timeout_parse_policy(void *timeouts,
>>>> struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr)
>>>> {
>>>> int ret = 0;
>>>> + struct nlattr **tb = NULL;
>>>
>>> I think we don't need to initialize this, right?
>>>
>>
>> We actually do have to initialized it because in the unlikely case that the
>> code block inside the 'if' below is not executed, then we will end up
>> freeing an uninitialized pointer.
>
> I see, you're right indeed.
>
> We can probably simplify this code, but just doing:
>
> if (!l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_to_obj))
> return 0;
>
I wonder if it is better to code this instead:
if (unlikely(!l4proto->ctnl_timeout.nlattr_to_obj)))
return 0;
> netlink attribute parsing here.
>
> You could even remove the likely() thing, which doesn't make much
> sense for control plane code.
>
Why is that?
> I understand this is a larger change, but I think this function will
> look better while we're removing VLA.
>
> Would you mind having a look? I'd appreciate if so.
>
I can do that. No problem.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-11 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 18:47 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-03-11 22:04 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-03-11 22:12 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-03-11 22:21 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-03-11 22:45 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fb8c8194-ce51-828c-f8e9-52a1c7763caa@embeddedor.com \
--to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®