mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@arnaud-lcm.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, eddyz87@gmail.com, haoluo@google.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	sdf@fomichev.me, song@kernel.org,
	syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack()
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 12:01:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbabac62-4bc1-4c11-9316-ed51ae9dbb0d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250807175032.7381-1-contact@arnaud-lcm.com>



On 8/7/25 10:50 AM, Arnaud Lecomte wrote:
> A new helper function stack_map_calculate_max_depth() that
> computes the max depth for a stackmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Lecomte <contact@arnaud-lcm.com>
> ---
>   kernel/bpf/stackmap.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> index 3615c06b7dfa..14e034045310 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,31 @@ static inline int stack_map_data_size(struct bpf_map *map)
>   		sizeof(struct bpf_stack_build_id) : sizeof(u64);
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * stack_map_calculate_max_depth - Calculate maximum allowed stack trace depth
> + * @map_size:        Size of the buffer/map value in bytes
> + * @elem_size:       Size of each stack trace element
> + * @map_flags:       BPF stack trace flags (BPF_F_USER_STACK, BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID, ...)
> + *
> + * Return: Maximum number of stack trace entries that can be safely stored,
> + * or -EINVAL if size is not a multiple of elem_size

-EINVAL is not needed here. See below.

> + */
> +static u32 stack_map_calculate_max_depth(u32 map_size, u32 map_elem_size, u64 map_flags)

map_elem_size -> elem_size

> +{
> +	u32 max_depth;
> +	u32 skip = map_flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;

reverse Christmas tree?

> +
> +	if (unlikely(map_size%map_elem_size))
> +		return -EINVAL;

The above should not be here. The checking 'map_size % map_elem_size' is only needed
for bpf_get_stack(), not applicable for bpf_get_stackid().

> +
> +	max_depth = map_size / map_elem_size;
> +	max_depth += skip;
> +	if (max_depth > sysctl_perf_event_max_stack)
> +		return sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
> +
> +	return max_depth;
> +}
> +
>   static int prealloc_elems_and_freelist(struct bpf_stack_map *smap)
>   {
>   	u64 elem_size = sizeof(struct stack_map_bucket) +
> @@ -406,7 +431,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>   			    struct perf_callchain_entry *trace_in,
>   			    void *buf, u32 size, u64 flags, bool may_fault)
>   {
> -	u32 trace_nr, copy_len, elem_size, num_elem, max_depth;
> +	u32 trace_nr, copy_len, elem_size, max_depth;
>   	bool user_build_id = flags & BPF_F_USER_BUILD_ID;
>   	bool crosstask = task && task != current;
>   	u32 skip = flags & BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK;
> @@ -423,8 +448,6 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>   		goto clear;
>   
>   	elem_size = user_build_id ? sizeof(struct bpf_stack_build_id) : sizeof(u64);
> -	if (unlikely(size % elem_size))
> -		goto clear;

Please keep this one.

>   
>   	/* cannot get valid user stack for task without user_mode regs */
>   	if (task && user && !user_mode(regs))
> @@ -438,10 +461,9 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>   		goto clear;
>   	}
>   
> -	num_elem = size / elem_size;
> -	max_depth = num_elem + skip;
> -	if (sysctl_perf_event_max_stack < max_depth)
> -		max_depth = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
> +	max_depth = stack_map_calculate_max_depth(size, elem_size, flags);
> +	if (max_depth < 0)
> +		goto err_fault;

max_depth is never less than 0.

>   
>   	if (may_fault)
>   		rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
> @@ -461,7 +483,7 @@ static long __bpf_get_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *task,
>   	}
>   
>   	trace_nr = trace->nr - skip;
> -	trace_nr = (trace_nr <= num_elem) ? trace_nr : num_elem;
> +	trace_nr = min(trace_nr, max_depth - skip);
>   	copy_len = trace_nr * elem_size;
>   
>   	ips = trace->ip + skip;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-07 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-29 16:56 [PATCH v2] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-07-29 22:45 ` Yonghong Song
2025-07-30  7:10   ` Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-01 18:16     ` Lecomte, Arnaud
2025-08-05 20:49       ` Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-06  1:52         ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-07 17:50           ` [PATCH 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-07 17:52             ` [PATCH 2/2] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-07 19:05               ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-07 19:01             ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-08-07 19:07               ` [PATCH 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Yonghong Song
2025-08-09 11:56                 ` [PATCH v2 " Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-09 11:58                   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-09 12:09                     ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-09 12:14                       ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-12  4:39                       ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Yonghong Song
2025-08-12 19:30                         ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 " Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-12 19:32                           ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-13  5:59                             ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-13 20:46                               ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-13 20:55                                 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/2] bpf: fix stackmap overflow check in __bpf_get_stackid() Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-18 13:49                                   ` Lecomte, Arnaud
2025-08-18 16:57                                     ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-18 17:02                                       ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-19 16:20                                         ` Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-13  5:54                           ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] bpf: refactor max_depth computation in bpf_get_stack() Yonghong Song
2025-08-12 19:32                         ` [PATCH RESEND v2 " Arnaud Lecomte
2025-08-08  7:30             ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fbabac62-4bc1-4c11-9316-ed51ae9dbb0d@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=contact@arnaud-lcm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+c9b724fbb41cf2538b7b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome