From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF0E43AA8 for ; Sun, 4 May 2025 11:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746358258; cv=none; b=OO2zA/cJq4rO6sxzAqDng/p2FPS36j1WSfQXJAHMqqhjooDWW7KNXEHvjiR0NB5AdEEPi5Iy7tcnWgOkNUqvVuPNs7qPnRoAuaggPLYx+TdMSSY//LNakPfhc6Sgr2yOWcG/iS+5WhPx6Q3R7Vx2qBdRIy2rti203odfzaHc0rI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746358258; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ht81KqRFYdhj6o3Gw8ymvJM+JmwvnLJV/L0dXKOReK0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hmZeZ6p8vGULpGHnqkNU5VWcPpXH9W0kiSS4vn2bZnVMp6OQfL5M0PaKaik23FemWpkoKHirq8Ach/k6+MR70zAjEEz4VrWarSPF8lncrzIhNRlTOXV6i32YshPviWZan/zVohOBtL063Zt8uWEeFIkpNs3X7yNNqUeAc/TVfEs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Fhrs6DbA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Fhrs6DbA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1746358254; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EazkyjVOz4TwmCMWeSQ28sdm9rYVdcferzElC0nH0h8=; b=Fhrs6DbAv8XuG/8iN0V6AM5wAmSHgM7u+AhUpRI8LuRwcgWfc3bUls6Pr4QeGdhZ2u+u6y eYQ4v8gWAwJrWYJ19W/3VTFMyQHCI6pzD1C57SnNM3bAxvgTwg6T5xPVJduGIcWLfp0SoQ 2EtfpgSnH9fLt8IT2jBlr0nOPHhKSTo= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-459-MF_yTTSgMg6Urhq-ULfCDg-1; Sun, 04 May 2025 07:30:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MF_yTTSgMg6Urhq-ULfCDg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: MF_yTTSgMg6Urhq-ULfCDg_1746358249 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13671956087; Sun, 4 May 2025 11:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.80.45] (unknown [10.22.80.45]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077EB195608D; Sun, 4 May 2025 11:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 13:30:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikulas Patocka To: Benjamin Marzinski , Dan Carpenter cc: Eric Biggers , Satya Tangirala , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm: add missing unlock on in dm_keyslot_evict() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20250430165037.GA1958@sol.localdomain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On Wed, 30 Apr 2025, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Ben already tried to fix it in dm_blk_report_zones (see the linux-dm git, > for-next branch) - but his fix is incorrect because the "if" condition for > dm_get_live_table and dm_put_live_table differs. I'll update his patch to > fix this mismatch. > > Mikulas I fixed it in the Ben's patch "dm: fix dm_blk_report_zones". Ben, please review it - it's the patch 37f53a2c60d03743e0eacf7a0c01c279776fef4e in the linux-dm repository, for-next branch. Mikulas