From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Denzeel Oliva <wachiturroxd150@gmail.com>,
Umer Uddin <umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org>
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] arm64: dts: exynos990: define all PERIC USI nodes
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:20:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbd06330-ccf3-485b-800f-83f624a7c90e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABeP6EGt1vOyxbc=vnCjBSimERLTV5_QV5Ph8p3SP4vc_z2=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/02/2025 20:39, Denzeel Oliva wrote:
> Yes, I know that, I just wanted to show my patches and I still have more.
So this is unmergeable? Then why this is not marked appropriately, e.g. RFC?
Don't send unfinished, unbuilldable work as normal patches because it
wastes out time.
I drop all your patches from my queue.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-09 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 22:22 [PATCH v1 0/9] Add PERIC0/1 support for Exynos 990 Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] dt-bindings: clock: samsung,exynos990-clock: add PERIC0/1 clock management unit Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-06 7:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add samsung,exynos990-hsi2c compatible Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-06 7:41 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] dt-bindings: serial: samsung: add Exynos990 compatible Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-06 7:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] dt-bindings: samsung: usi: add exynos990-usi compatible Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] spi: dt-bindings: samsung: add samsung,exynos990-spi compatible Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-06 7:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-sysreg: add compatibles peric0/1 sysreg for Exynos990 Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] clk: samsung: exynos990: add support for CMU_PERIC0/1 Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] spi: s3c64xx: add support exynos990-spi to new port config data Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-05 22:22 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] arm64: dts: exynos990: define all PERIC USI nodes Denzeel Oliva
2025-02-08 19:18 ` Umer Uddin
[not found] ` <CABeP6EGt1vOyxbc=vnCjBSimERLTV5_QV5Ph8p3SP4vc_z2=nQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-09 10:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-02-06 7:45 ` [PATCH v1 0/9] Add PERIC0/1 support for Exynos 990 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-07 15:21 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbd06330-ccf3-485b-800f-83f624a7c90e@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=umer.uddin@mentallysanemainliners.org \
--cc=wachiturroxd150@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®