mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geralt <usr.gentoo@googlemail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Shebang - why are parameters not splitted on whitespace?
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 18:29:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbdd0e50812030929s2d573981k46757c1b706f4cd5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbdd0e50812030929q65d2e805y49094dd67209be7e@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Geralt <usr.gentoo@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just noticed, that it's not possible to use more than one
>> parameter in a shebang on linux, because everything following the
>> executable path in the shebang is treated as one parameter, so for
>> example
>> #!/bin/awk --re-interval -f
>> in a script called "test.awk" results in a call likes this:
>> /bin/awk "--re-interval -f" ./test.awk
>> when running it with "./test.awk".
>>
>> Is there any reason why the parameters are not split before passing
>> them on to the program?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I think this behavior is different on different platforms, you can
> find some clues
> in man page of execve(2):
>
>       The  semantics  of  the  optional-arg argument of an interpreter script
>       vary across implementations.  On Linux, the entire string following the
>       interpreter name is passed as a single argument to the interpreter, and
>       this string can include white space.  However, behavior differs on some
>       other  systems.   Some  systems  use the first white space to terminate
>       optional-arg.  On some systems, an interpreter script can have multiple
>       arguments,  and  white  spaces  in optional-arg are used to delimit the
>       arguments
>
> It seems that POSIX doesn't specify this.
>
> Thanks.
>

Hello,

I should have anticipated this objection :-). I'm aware that this is
not consistent among Unix operating systems (you can find more about
it here [1]), but I was specifically refering to linux in this case
and why it handles the shebang arguments as one big string and not as
single arguments for the application.



Geralt.


[1] http://www.in-ulm.de/~mascheck/various/shebang/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-03 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-03 15:14 Geralt
2008-12-03 15:56 ` Américo Wang
     [not found]   ` <fbdd0e50812030929q65d2e805y49094dd67209be7e@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-03 17:29     ` Geralt [this message]
2008-12-06  1:04       ` Américo Wang
2008-12-06  5:41         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-12-06 12:02           ` Geralt
2008-12-06 21:14             ` Aaron Cohen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fbdd0e50812030929s2d573981k46757c1b706f4cd5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=usr.gentoo@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®