From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: never clear irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:20:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbf3e1665357d9517015ad49eee0c9825ed876d4.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <636dd644-8160-645a-ce5a-f4eb344f001c@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 13:07 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/9/21 12:54, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > It is possible that during the AVIC incomplete IPI vmexit,
> > its handler will set irr_pending to true,
> > but the target vCPU will still see the IRR bit not set,
> > due to the apparent lack of memory ordering between CPU's vIRR write
> > that is supposed to happen prior to the AVIC incomplete IPI
> > vmexit and the write of the irr_pending in that handler.
>
> Are you sure about this? Store-to-store ordering should be
> guaranteed---if not by the architecture---by existing memory barriers
> between vmrun returning and avic_incomplete_ipi_interception(). For
> example, srcu_read_lock implies an smp_mb().
>
> Even more damning: no matter what internal black magic the processor
> could be using to write to IRR, the processor needs to order the writes
> against reads of IsRunning on processors without the erratum. That
> would be equivalent to flushing the store buffer, and it would imply
> that the write of vIRR is ordered before the write to irr_pending.
>
> Paolo
>
Yes I almost 100% sure now that this patch is wrong.
the code was just seeing irr_pending true because it is set
to true while APICv/AVIC is use, and was not seeing yet the vIRR bits,
because they didn't arrive yet. This this patch isn't needed.
Thanks again for help!
I am testing your version of fixes to avic inhibition races,
and then I'll send a new version of these patches.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-09 11:54 [PATCH 0/6] RFC: KVM: SVM: Allow L1's AVIC to co-exist with nesting Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86: add a tracepoint for APICv/AVIC interrupt delivery Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: SVM: fix AVIC race of host->guest IPI delivery vs AVIC inhibition Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 14:26 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 15:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-09 15:33 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 15:35 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: SVM: fix races in the AVIC incomplete IPI delivery to vCPUs Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 15:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-12-10 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: never clear irr_pending in kvm_apic_update_apicv Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-09 15:03 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 12:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 12:20 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-12-10 12:47 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-10 13:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-12-10 13:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-12-09 11:54 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: SVM: allow AVIC to co-exist with a nested guest running Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbf3e1665357d9517015ad49eee0c9825ed876d4.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®