From: Traian Teodorescu <traian.teodorescu@bluewin.ch>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: Linux entropy
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 05:51:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbf48030-c702-8964-7614-365bbcb4faee@bluewin.ch> (raw)
Hello,
I've been redirected by the "friendly bot" to you (I've already looked
into "kernelnewbies" but I didn't find a linked topic). I would want to
know more about the subject below. Is there another possibility to read
the value of current entropy in new versions of kernel ? Are the old
services (as for instance haveged) still compatible ?
Thank you and have a nice evening,
Traian
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Linux entropy
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:03:36 +0100
From: Traian Teodorescu <traian.teodorescu@bluewin.ch>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Mr Kroah-Hartmann,
I've recently discovered that the value containing the machine's entropy
(in /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail ) isn't updated anymore on one
of my machines. I found some articles on the Internet about this change,
but nothing very "official".
There is also an explanation at
"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-5.15.y&id=e7e196e1ae2603a2c5f1894f1868a7a5b5a2c5e0"
about keeping forward secrecy, etc, that I didn't really understood.
I began using Linux since less than 10 years and I am not what you can
call an experienced user, but from my point of view this change doesn't
make sense. If I understand well some basic principles, Linux kernel is
the only one meant to be accessible to everybody wanting to understand
deeply how a modern OS works, so what's the gain in this "obfuscation"
? From my point of view, a sysadmin should know how much entropy they
have on their machines.
So, please, can you please make some comments about this change ? (of
eventually send me a link to an article that I can trust ?)
I really enjoyed Linux a lot those years and I learned to appreciate it,
so from this point of view I am grateful to the teams maintaining free
software, so ... thank you !
Thanks for an eventual answer and have a nice evening,
Traian
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 4:51 Traian Teodorescu [this message]
2023-03-25 23:03 ` Fwd: " Traian Teodorescu
2023-03-26 3:38 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbf48030-c702-8964-7614-365bbcb4faee@bluewin.ch \
--to=traian.teodorescu@bluewin.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®