From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751145AbdAMRZL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:25:11 -0500
Received: from smtprelay4.synopsys.com ([198.182.47.9]:50947 "EHLO
        smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750818AbdAMRZG (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:25:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/37] PCI: dwc: designware: Get device pointer at the
 start of dw_pcie_host_init
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1484216786-17292-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
 <1484216786-17292-8-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
CC: <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@axis.com>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <nsekhar@ti.com>
From: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>
Message-ID: <fbfa32a8-0897-9c8a-618c-bb41fa26c532@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:22:44 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1484216786-17292-8-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.107.19.116]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Hi!

Ās 10:25 AM de 1/12/2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I escreveu:
> No functional change. Get device pointer at the beginning of
> dw_pcie_host_init instead of getting it all over dw_pcie_host_init.
> This is in preparation for splitting struct pcie_port into host and
> core structures (Once split pcie_port will not have device pointer).
> 

I think change should be condense with another patch to reduce the patch-set
number and to give it real meaning. I understand why you are breaking so much
the patch, it is has a lot of changes, but in my opinion is too much fragmented.

Thanks
Joao