From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ceph: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 11:23:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc02b2d29ecb7e277d48afb340b01cdc684e2e5a.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331215329.882411-2-jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 23:53 +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
> macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
> variable after the loop body.
>
> To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
> concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
> found boolean [1].
>
> This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
> the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/ceph/caps.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> index 519750bc5a1a..70f9c5ffa9b7 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> @@ -3179,10 +3179,9 @@ void ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int nr,
> struct ceph_snap_context *snapc)
> {
> struct inode *inode = &ci->vfs_inode;
> - struct ceph_cap_snap *capsnap = NULL;
> + struct ceph_cap_snap *capsnap = NULL, *iter;
> int put = 0;
> bool last = false;
> - bool found = false;
> bool flush_snaps = false;
> bool complete_capsnap = false;
>
> @@ -3209,14 +3208,14 @@ void ceph_put_wrbuffer_cap_refs(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int nr,
> ci->i_wrbuffer_ref, ci->i_wrbuffer_ref_head,
> last ? " LAST" : "");
> } else {
> - list_for_each_entry(capsnap, &ci->i_cap_snaps, ci_item) {
> - if (capsnap->context == snapc) {
> - found = true;
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &ci->i_cap_snaps, ci_item) {
> + if (iter->context == snapc) {
> + capsnap = iter;
> break;
> }
> }
>
> - if (!found) {
> + if (!capsnap) {
> /*
> * The capsnap should already be removed when removing
> * auth cap in the case of a forced unmount.
> @@ -3766,8 +3765,7 @@ static void handle_cap_flushsnap_ack(struct inode *inode, u64 flush_tid,
> struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = ceph_sb_to_client(inode->i_sb)->mdsc;
> u64 follows = le64_to_cpu(m->snap_follows);
> - struct ceph_cap_snap *capsnap;
> - bool flushed = false;
> + struct ceph_cap_snap *capsnap = NULL, *iter;
> bool wake_ci = false;
> bool wake_mdsc = false;
>
> @@ -3775,26 +3773,26 @@ static void handle_cap_flushsnap_ack(struct inode *inode, u64 flush_tid,
> inode, ci, session->s_mds, follows);
>
> spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(capsnap, &ci->i_cap_snaps, ci_item) {
> - if (capsnap->follows == follows) {
> - if (capsnap->cap_flush.tid != flush_tid) {
> + list_for_each_entry(iter, &ci->i_cap_snaps, ci_item) {
> + if (iter->follows == follows) {
> + if (iter->cap_flush.tid != flush_tid) {
> dout(" cap_snap %p follows %lld tid %lld !="
> - " %lld\n", capsnap, follows,
> - flush_tid, capsnap->cap_flush.tid);
> + " %lld\n", iter, follows,
> + flush_tid, iter->cap_flush.tid);
> break;
> }
> - flushed = true;
> + capsnap = iter;
> break;
> } else {
> dout(" skipping cap_snap %p follows %lld\n",
> - capsnap, capsnap->follows);
> + iter, iter->follows);
> }
> }
> - if (flushed)
> + if (capsnap)
> ceph_remove_capsnap(inode, capsnap, &wake_ci, &wake_mdsc);
> spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
>
> - if (flushed) {
> + if (capsnap) {
> ceph_put_snap_context(capsnap->context);
> ceph_put_cap_snap(capsnap);
> if (wake_ci)
Thanks Jakob,
Both patches look fine. Applied to the ceph-client/testing branch. This
should make v5.19 if there are no issues.
Thanks!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-31 21:53 [PATCH 1/2] ceph: use " Jakob Koschel
2022-03-31 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] ceph: replace usage of found with " Jakob Koschel
2022-04-01 15:23 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc02b2d29ecb7e277d48afb340b01cdc684e2e5a.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome