From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1164C35CECD for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757437215; cv=none; b=YjqF7FvaOuYXfNCrflrdQDQlJqAuqJY5+0SSnELy84JHatFiZAN/Nrn+rH0ODtWeTEYySjaasIw3WYBJr5TFM/NCGW15hbTD47SLx6llZ7Selp4CbDvIs/aS8keXMAZ65DxOAqgcR7SSYpJZWsKj27gMqW/bQRBsJx9IYgydFQc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757437215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Crpcx3htqIXlWcK/EWlDbcG8U67m5fcwxAlWIAfi0wI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=tRMKCePJeFDhG/EQgghAHcaMBd5YnAiYcebZNVjgDifFChUyxUenz13My5s79DvyWAE9MsStn30I2dGCprL58f86iABwNqSzkPMpA9SO9C4yPl0rljPOU/sP+kBtAsrqX+WNxXOBb08LyX4OQTExENikV0jdzGfFgjP89g7wjjY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=M7PQYC0K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="M7PQYC0K" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cLqnP0cD7z9sqy; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:00:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1757437209; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8C0W0SKWXcWn5s8zylmFoekpERTUlNapTG1su6iUWPE=; b=M7PQYC0KJ7ZTpsiCivEMtqWEYpZzwIu6qRgTil1nq6k2JZiuEJwhHQcrpfxtKnMsGEs/qv CuAOJ0YGCRXXuDy3Fwa29l+Dz1ClbvbDzgvV1tyqrz13mWEhn3c/xfEvjkrRCHzNxJO0s/ J1pajVOoI+b6D2WlDyeqa+Fm9dLq8XXnozAhtThdMz+xBgx/N8EJzmzLAh54eOGMPh8iz3 LHRe2Hbdwb30NHgHgg3ljHAzwRff95n3UQ27IjEjOAqJ47Z41Dl839SNzX19nUP43NqtD5 nvW906emnD3uGZAbvkaWeGIpHz80vYygxZwc9JGhkUTFcVdG8AcOzATZTXJNgw== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 19:00:04 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: evergreen_packet3_check:... radeon 0000:1d:00.0: vbo resource seems too big for the bo To: Alex Deucher , Borislav Petkov Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Alex Deucher , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20250829194044.GCaLICPKJcGJRYdSfO@fat_crate.local> <20250829204840.GEaLISKGTwuScnDF8Y@fat_crate.local> <20250830174810.GAaLM5WkiFc2BtQ6kW@fat_crate.local> <51ae551b-6708-4fcd-84f9-fc1400f02427@mailbox.org> <20250901101011.GAaLVxA_Ax0R-Wy2IX@fat_crate.local> <2764782f-d411-4142-aa56-f1af0968ecd5@mailbox.org> <20250908180022.GHaL8Zto-PsVsPa0e0@fat_crate.local> <63b7c020-e589-4644-887e-3922af939009@mailbox.org> <20250909161648.GAaMBS8ERsvv3NbJoF@fat_crate.local> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Michel_D=C3=A4nzer?= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MBO-RS-ID: f727388cebe6545a786 X-MBO-RS-META: aibpfeh4fjwqfimh8zxpqmezdjpfjagx On 09.09.25 18:21, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:17 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 10:43:47AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> Then the developer needs to tell the user how to enable the debugging output >>> and get it to them. That's pretty standard. >> >> *IF* the user even notices anything. As said earlier, it didn't cause any >> anomalies on my machine besides flooding dmesg. Which I look at for obvious >> reasons but users probably don't. > > Right. I think there needs to be something otherwise no one will notice at all. I concede that in this specific case, dev_warn_once might be the best compromise. (More to come in a follow-up to Alex's corresponding patch for the other similar log messages in this file) -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ GNOME / Xwayland / Mesa developer https://redhat.com \ Libre software enthusiast