Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: adv7511: Add support for ADV7535

[Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>]

On 27.11.19 15:22, Togorean, Bogdan wrote:
> Hi Frieder,
> 
> I'm glad to find there are other persons interested in this driver and
> especially support for ADV7535. Unfortunately I had to put on hold the
> development due to other activities but I'll send V3 tomorrow.

Great to hear that. Thanks for your effort. I will try to test your v3 
when I have received the new hardware and got it up and running.

> 
> I also started work on HDCP support for this driver and hope to send
> soon a patch for that.
> 
> Best regards,
> Bogdan
> 
> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 11:52 +0000, Schrempf Frieder wrote:
>> [External]
>>
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> On 21.08.19 07:34, Togorean, Bogdan wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 10:53 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> [External]
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:46:16PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>>>> Hi Bogdan.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    		adv7533_detach_dsi(adv7511);
>>>>>>>>    	i2c_unregister_device(adv7511->i2c_cec);
>>>>>>>>    	if (adv7511->cec_clk)
>>>>>>>> @@ -1266,8 +1278,9 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id
>>>>>>>> adv7511_i2c_ids[] = {
>>>>>>>>    	{ "adv7511", ADV7511 },
>>>>>>>>    	{ "adv7511w", ADV7511 },
>>>>>>>>    	{ "adv7513", ADV7511 },
>>>>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7533
>>>>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV753x
>>>>>>>>    	{ "adv7533", ADV7533 },
>>>>>>>> +	{ "adv7535", ADV7535 },
>>>>>>>>    #endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This ifdef may not be needed??
>>>>>>> If we did not get this type we will not look it up.
>>>>>> But if we have defined in DT adv7533/5 device but
>>>>>> CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV753x not selected probe will fail with
>>>>>> ENODEV.
>>>>>> That
>>>>>> would be ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> What do we gain from this complexity in the end.
>>>>> Why not let the driver always support all variants.
>>>>>
>>>>> If this result in a simpler driver, and less choices in Kconfig
>>>>> then it is a win-win.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah in general we don't Kconfig within drivers in drm to disable
>>>> specific
>>>> code-paths. It's not worth the pain.
>>   >
>>> Ack,
>>> Thank you for clarification. Will remove in V3.
>>
>> Are you still working on this? Do you plan to send a v3?
>> I will soon lay my hands on a board with the ADV7535 and would like
>> to
>> see this merged.
>> Also for patch 1/2, it seems you already have a R-b for v1 from
>> Laurent,
>> but you didn't carry the tag to v2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Frieder