From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4A8C63798 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD9D2220B for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 14:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="EyS7VzGk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391063AbgKZOaK (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:30:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38040 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390058AbgKZOaJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:30:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5A3C0617A7 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id i2so2350460wrs.4 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:30:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qjw5BGAC1OUkdIRzZbjBG7uO0JS7gQo7z8PLbOgPVdI=; b=EyS7VzGk5OS+wfql1FLOoKeYvdNvog/Hw/jR40GT6uXA2EFvPQqmCg/8v4yn8OjoEU HtmSxJ/+k/iCqv2v70Bq0Vngpx8EoNyd66FoxioCW2bo4vsMJlc5Bhtb7d5fP39jKVBb 4ABRg+zTUQ+nSZu0AEqwdLlvEyPWNCKavAjQNzGcagejujtJ3pBkZpibNEAChuem7hCd kuLH21hWrvkIs3HGnWaLg3hnX6tP9No0vxRbcv+773kn4yCFIbtsx/jP3w94eyFcNe/c SDYT5gOpsiGELv9nAAcHvLkV8T3pjHEITJYf+3QCqsHStgTtlOLy8zPiuRAKc+xSkDfj vYzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qjw5BGAC1OUkdIRzZbjBG7uO0JS7gQo7z8PLbOgPVdI=; b=QFXFo1Beq02q3Q8NyPgMyTTdT6ZGtYm+Ig7w+us2MOaZMyscWmc6kCFf5VTcDPpjsE DdGX62jONyeIBrLzW/QrfuBAiiO3VZrmlgBYW9s+nlROU4KTOx5ZgvNIBJDk4O8iMCAN onCYWh53n0b8KGaFujRPKdCdAwG0z9ilIM6PFlyhkHa7VESKuLGr0MNElOKqv2Ev4hn/ 3kLb1gz3chxILq6EAyVEAypuAVF0Smg8sd3lkFiyRhqndcY51Aam0Qkq1jXdqpl16T0k XOTis9DiaSOMSlV8WV1PzW+XWbY0z9XXy/Uya9mq3IFt+aAX1lEgG2nIBYWuTeaRWBdh PMBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533isirh+66dcDC7NaewFiHugaPRrz7bLbyqIvkMQN2IyS+jSTw/ 5cP0xMsPSvlXqIDwZ0DXjiCV7Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywrnVvV3+/kgozQi7zTGjBuawogmdUdh1QH2TsfW/amIudAmYPyYaILHVuPXdhACmIwNsy9w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4802:: with SMTP id l2mr4139880wrq.424.1606401007282; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e34:ed2f:f020:c023:e75f:e8c4:d86? ([2a01:e34:ed2f:f020:c023:e75f:e8c4:d86]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u129sm8211203wme.9.2020.11.26.06.30.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2020 06:30:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power Allocation To: Lukasz Luba Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, amitk@kernel.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com References: <20201124161025.27694-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> From: Daniel Lezcano Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:30:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote: [ ... ] >>> changed via sysfs. >>> >>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree. >> >> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack. >> >> > > Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs? > Maybe I should drop mine then. Ok let me clarify :) In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I apply the changes or not. I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong. As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon. Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;) -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog