From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
To: Ryder Wang <rydercoding@hotmail.com>,
Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@axis.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "kernel@axis.com" <kernel@axis.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ubifs: Fix use-after-free in ubifs_tnc_end_commit
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:06:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc567699-59c7-265a-b7c8-7b658cc6fc05@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MEYP282MB316412B08A32373E5ED9B896BF4B2@MEYP282MB3164.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
在 2024/10/29 16:10, Ryder Wang 写道:
Hi, Ryder
> I just have some interesting finding.
>
> The code of the function write_index() has a race condition bug. c->enext is used in write_index(), but it is NOT protected by c->tnc_mutex. So there must be SOME race condition problem. I believe some znode may be corrupted or misread if 2 kernel tasks are operating the same znode concurrently.
Thanks for reporting that :-). I noticed it a period time ago too, and I
found 'c->znext', 'c->cnext' and 'znode->cnext' won't be accessed (in
write mode) by other tasks, because there is only one function
do_commit() modifying them and do_commit() can be executed by at most
one task in any time.
>
> The code comment of struct ubifs_info below indicates that c->enext must be protected by c->tnc_mutex.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * @tnc_mutex: protects the Tree Node Cache (TNC), @zroot, @cnext, @enext, and
> * @calc_idx_sz
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> That's why I don't think this patch can fully fix this issue because the race condition is still there.
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 14:46 Waqar Hameed
2024-10-12 12:30 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-10-15 18:52 ` Waqar Hameed
2024-10-16 2:11 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-10-17 18:36 ` Waqar Hameed
2024-10-18 1:40 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-11-06 16:36 ` Waqar Hameed
2024-11-07 7:14 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-11-07 22:11 ` Waqar Hameed
2024-10-29 8:10 ` Ryder Wang
2024-10-29 9:06 ` Zhihao Cheng [this message]
2024-10-29 9:56 ` Ryder Wang
2024-10-29 11:19 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-11-07 8:39 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-11-07 22:38 ` Waqar Hameed
2024-11-08 1:38 ` Zhihao Cheng
2024-11-08 18:02 ` Waqar Hameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc567699-59c7-265a-b7c8-7b658cc6fc05@huawei.com \
--to=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rydercoding@hotmail.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=waqar.hameed@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®