From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8595C433F5 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345509AbiCHJx3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 04:53:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32912 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345608AbiCHJxO (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 04:53:14 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2592F3FBD2; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 01:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2288eFml016853; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:15 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=+DbVfJM9T//JWovv3DB+Zga9LWmRsy++c1sznUWBOcc=; b=tAsy9WHjFvG4QIPmvLLx3qS+B57EXHbTabLvPV4uXznb7ZBMQ4xUQgDPJtYQmAHVcXTd ObTFvIoNLDILts8IKeqMjXCqGl8Q/W9/Bq9MFh+06hIQyF0XdPk4F1qqtXPLADWQVnZ4 wpDX6R49+hANfwxb+1Z3ND31LIdm3GrCyB5Fw1x91TkrTplkj8FovC/8eJbpDwJ4DWz+ cqCAQ3j761LMyXLY5IF8HlKe6NDdA5CvVerkGgHPao1gnOLGUkntXaWbS1+SPraXSB2f tg31YCAkErmnY1zi17M6wyfkGHl8Yc7yaBQKPlEoo3x2tXmSAmIObiwih5CuALzKb5fX yw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ep0sccr2j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:52:15 +0000 Received: from m0098413.ppops.net (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 2289aLQw013084; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:14 GMT Received: from ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (66.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.102]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3ep0sccr22-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:52:14 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2289h5Uu030993; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:13 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma06ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3eky4hy6av-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:52:13 +0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2289qAPG40305086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:10 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E600A405F; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59431A4054; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bb2b2a4c-3307-11b2-a85c-8fa5c3a69313.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.83.182]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:52:07 +0000 (GMT) From: Ojaswin Mujoo To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: Harshad Shirwadkar , "Theodore Ts'o" , Ritesh Harjani , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rnsastry@linux.ibm.com, Geetika Moolchandani Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Make mb_optimize_scan performance mount option work with extents Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 15:22:01 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: gFRTUXBF-YZPRnQnchzBQPB9BGED1qVC X-Proofpoint-GUID: VyyJX6WoVHVmI2TaY6gO4Q3BjUI3FA7- X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.816,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-08_03,2022-03-04_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203080049 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently mb_optimize_scan scan feature which improves filesystem performance heavily (when FS is fragmented), seems to be not working with files with extents (ext4 by default has files with extents). This patch fixes that and makes mb_optimize_scan feature work for files with extents. Below are some performance numbers obtained when allocating a 10M and 100M file with and w/o this patch on a filesytem with no 1M contiguous block. =============== Workload: dd if=/dev/urandom of=test conv=fsync bs=1M count=10/100 Time taken ===================================================== no. Size without-patch with-patch Diff(%) 1 10M 0m8.401s 0m5.623s 33.06% 2 100M 1m40.465s 1m14.737s 25.6% ============= w/o patch: mballoc: reqs: 17056 success: 11407 groups_scanned: 13643 cr0_stats: hits: 37 groups_considered: 9472 useless_loops: 36 bad_suggestions: 0 cr1_stats: hits: 11418 groups_considered: 908560 useless_loops: 1894 bad_suggestions: 0 cr2_stats: hits: 1873 groups_considered: 6913 useless_loops: 21 cr3_stats: hits: 21 groups_considered: 5040 useless_loops: 21 extents_scanned: 417364 goal_hits: 3707 2^n_hits: 37 breaks: 1873 lost: 0 buddies_generated: 239/240 buddies_time_used: 651080 preallocated: 705 discarded: 478 with patch: mballoc: reqs: 12768 success: 11305 groups_scanned: 12768 cr0_stats: hits: 1 groups_considered: 18 useless_loops: 0 bad_suggestions: 0 cr1_stats: hits: 5829 groups_considered: 50626 useless_loops: 0 bad_suggestions: 0 cr2_stats: hits: 6938 groups_considered: 580363 useless_loops: 0 cr3_stats: hits: 0 groups_considered: 0 useless_loops: 0 extents_scanned: 309059 goal_hits: 0 2^n_hits: 1 breaks: 1463 lost: 0 buddies_generated: 239/240 buddies_time_used: 791392 preallocated: 673 discarded: 446 Fixes: 196e402 (ext4: improve cr 0 / cr 1 group scanning) Reported-by: Geetika Moolchandani Reported-by: Nageswara R Sastry Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 67ac95c4cd9b..f9be6ab482a5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static inline int should_optimize_scan(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac) return 0; if (ac->ac_criteria >= 2) return 0; - if (ext4_test_inode_flag(ac->ac_inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) + if (!ext4_test_inode_flag(ac->ac_inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) return 0; return 1; } -- 2.27.0