mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Dharanitharan R <dharanitharan725@gmail.com>
Cc: sammy@sammy.net, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: i825xx: replace printk() with pr_*() macros for cleaner logging
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:24:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcb18197-af45-4f7d-a435-39796c51c1e7@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251028100127.14839-1-dharanitharan725@gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:01:27AM +0000, Dharanitharan R wrote:
> This patch replaces printk() calls in sun3_82586.c with appropriate pr_*()
> macros (pr_err, pr_info, etc.) according to Linux kernel logging conventions.

You have a Sun3? I've not seen one in maybe 25 years.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

says:

1.6.6. Clean-up patches

Netdev discourages patches which perform simple clean-ups, which are
not in the context of other work. For example:

Addressing checkpatch.pl, and other trivial coding style warnings

Addressing Local variable ordering issues

Conversions to device-managed APIs (devm_ helpers)

This is because it is felt that the churn that such changes produce
comes at a greater cost than the value of such clean-ups.

Please state in the commit message if you have run these patches on
hardware, and plan to do other work on the Sun3 driver, new features
etc.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr

      reply	other threads:[~2025-10-28 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28 10:01 Dharanitharan R
2025-10-28 13:24 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcb18197-af45-4f7d-a435-39796c51c1e7@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dharanitharan725@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sammy@sammy.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®