From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2736FC433E0 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0419820656 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=st.com header.i=@st.com header.b="o4tYZ167" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726904AbgGXN7O (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:59:14 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:17018 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726658AbgGXN7O (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 09:59:14 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046668.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 06ODrl1D022365; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:58:58 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=KRUo6+0et9uIWzr/7OGkArIbrkrXoASlOdUHAzwrQ+c=; b=o4tYZ167aIAxYvG71/FxDIp91Y1Gl3UWSaaPkCo/tPveq6Rp1PD4p6uJo7eG/TRCpSrr 4oz3oWk5Ge+YQ9BVEoqj+gbxiP+M25v2/4yKJk2n0vb1y52THqdiO2oX9r8Ie9RGZN1y w6pJ5JpPu5ini7M89305qeM9d8QaP6TLpYJdcPr8JwzJAKj491Nc+oM2J74+/cUGxhNj DCAaWGs3usAwNJXCW1mODvpK2DtZxKnNt8ZM2YhzF2yBbDyIQHTMcFaTdzID+A8kbUSZ LVz+Wm/JRsR8RD0wU/bQnzdQYlAvidy+qemtpIcFXMSSx5PQYfE17Lmk5QM6U717JD1u 4A== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx07-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 32bsfq0hx2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:58:58 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 3DBB110002A; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:58:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node2.st.com [10.75.127.8]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 2557C2B4D1F; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:58:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmecxl0995.lme.st.com (10.75.127.49) by SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:58:56 +0200 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add USB role switch support to DWC2 To: Felipe Balbi , Minas Harutyunyan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre TORGUE CC: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , Fabrice GASNIER , Martin Blumenstingl References: <20200724104711.5474-1-amelie.delaunay@st.com> <4c44f596-d2c3-6d2f-bf28-9e3964b6e6f1@st.com> <878sf9owcw.fsf@kernel.org> From: Amelie DELAUNAY Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 15:58:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <878sf9owcw.fsf@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.49] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG4NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.12) To SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-24_04:2020-07-24,2020-07-24 signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 7/24/20 3:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > (no top-posting, please) > > Hi, > > Amelie DELAUNAY writes: >> Series dropped. > > what do you mean with this? Should I drop all patches related with this series? > As v1 patches were in your next branch, I've prepared a new patchset which contains fixes, on top of you next branch : https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=454959 What do you prefer ? Drop all patches related to the v1 "Add USB role switch support to DWC2" series and I send a v4 in replacement or keep all patches and wait for new series review ?