From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
james.morse@arm.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
fenghuay@nvidia.com, tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com,
jic23@kernel.org, zengheng4@huawei.com, gshan@redhat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm_mpam: resctrl: Leave CDP off when there are too few PARTIDs
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 11:34:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd20a317-1f3c-43bf-b629-587877cf9503@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <750c9d05-94f8-4936-a824-5ccbed1d13ed@huawei.com>
Hi Jinjie,
On 06/11/2026 08:35, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Is this modification okay?
Yes it's ok but there is more we can do here. Sashiko has raised a bug that points out we don't take
into account whether or not a resource is cdp_capable or not [1].
This leads to an additional check along the lines of:
if (enable && (!the_res.alloc_capable || !the_res.cdp_capable))
return -EINVAL;
On a process note, it would helpful to me for reviewing and later on when collecting the patches
together if you could put related patches together in a series. In the case of this patch it it is
solving a cdp related problem, as is your patch "arm_mpam: resctrl: Limit num_rmids to the CLOSIDs
in use". fs/resctrl patches though should be kept separately unless there is a particular reason why
they should be in a series with MPAM patches, e.g. new resctrl_arch_ helpers and such like.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-05c19551-0bba-4a06-aa2c-3c90fab5853d
Thanks,
Ben
>
> 在 2026/10/31 10:52, Jinjie Ruan 写道:
>> Enabling CDP requires at least 2 PARTIDs. If there are too few PARTIDs,
>> resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled() returns -EINVAL, but only after it has
>> recorded CDP as enabled, halved the monitor count and turned off the
>> mbw_max MBA control. resctrl then believes CDP is off, which leaves the
>> two sides out of step and the halved monitor count and the missing MBA
>> control are not undone.
>>
>> Check the PARTID limit before anything is changed so a failed enable has
>> no effect.
>>
>> Fixes: 6789fb99282c ("arm_mpam: resctrl: Add CDP emulation")
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> RFC v2 -> v1:
>> - Check mpam_partid_max ahead and The partid_d/partid_i determination
>> remains in place.
>> - Update the commit message as Ben suggested.
>> ---
>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
>> index 5468367776e2..aa3b3a093857 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
>> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
>> if (enable)
>> pr_warn("CDP is an expert feature and may cause MPAM to malfunction.\n");
>>
>> + if (enable && mpam_partid_max < 1)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> /*
>> * resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled() is only called with enable set to
>> * false on error and unmount.
>> @@ -239,9 +242,6 @@ int resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid, bool enable)
>> mpam_resctrl_controls[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].resctrl_res.alloc_capable = true;
>>
>> if (enable) {
>> - if (mpam_partid_max < 1)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> partid_d = resctrl_get_config_index(RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID, CDP_DATA);
>> partid_i = resctrl_get_config_index(RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID, CDP_CODE);
>> }
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 2:52 Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-06 8:35 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-11-06 11:34 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd20a317-1f3c-43bf-b629-587877cf9503@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=zengheng4@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®