From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753095AbcKUIjQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:39:16 -0500 Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:47976 "EHLO lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752500AbcKUIjP (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 03:39:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: davinci: Allow device tree devices to use DMA To: David Lechner , Mark Brown References: <1479530464-12538-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <79f186b5-ac71-189f-c19f-977670395043@ti.com> <946d60bc-ac14-7934-c1b3-e2de03831459@lechnology.com> CC: , , , From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:07:53 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <946d60bc-ac14-7934-c1b3-e2de03831459@lechnology.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 20 November 2016 10:31 PM, David Lechner wrote: > On 11/20/2016 06:59 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Saturday 19 November 2016 10:11 AM, David Lechner wrote: >>> @@ -400,6 +401,9 @@ static int davinci_spi_of_setup(struct spi_device >>> *spi) >>> if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,spi-wdelay", &prop)) >>> spicfg->wdelay = (u8)prop; >>> spi->controller_data = spicfg; >>> + /* Use DMA for device if master supports it */ >>> + if (dspi->dma_rx) >> >> This should be >> >> if (!(IS_ERR(dpsi->dma_rx) || IS_ERR(dspi->dma_tx)) > > > There is the following code in davinci_spi_probe(): > > ret = davinci_spi_request_dma(dspi); > if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) { > goto free_clk; > } else if (ret) { > dev_info(&pdev->dev, "DMA is not supported (%d)\n", ret); > dspi->dma_rx = NULL; > dspi->dma_tx = NULL; > } > > So, I does not look like it is possible to get anything other than NULL > or a valid pointer for dpsi->dma_rx and that checking dpsi->dma_tx is > not necessary. > > So, I think if (dspi->dma_rx) is sufficient. In fact the same check is > used during unwinding if the probe function fails. You are right, I see it now. Setting dma_rx to NULL overriding the error value is confusing since dma_request_chan() itself does not use NULL as an error value. I think it is better to fix the existing code to remove the NULL overwrite and use IS_ERR() instead. You should probably wait for some feedback from the SPI maintainer though. Thanks, Sekhar