mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, mattbobrowski@google.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
	repnop@google.com, jlayton@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
	gnoack@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 01:23:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd995e37-9369-4375-8718-8338e732860f@maowtm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW75h3efyXmCcYE_UEmZGXR5KMSEw8h-_vrZH82BYU=WVw@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/11/25 00:08, Song Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 3:26 PM Tingmao Wang <m@maowtm.org> wrote:
> [..]
>>>
>>>                 if (!choose_mountpoint(real_mount(path->mnt), root, &p))
>>>                         return false;
>>>                 path_put(path);
>>>                 *path = p;
>>>                 ret = true;
>>>         }
>>>
>>>         if (unlikely(IS_ROOT(path->dentry)))
>>>                 return ret;
>>
>> Returning true here would be the wrong semantic right?  This whole thing
>> is only possible when some mount shadows "/".  Say if you have a landlock
>> rule on the old "/", but then we mount a new "/" and chroot into it (via
>> "/.."), the landlock rule on the old "/" should not apply, but if we
>> change *path and return true here then this will "expose" that old "/" to
>> landlock.
> 
> Could you please provide more specific information about this case?

Apologies, it looks like I was mistaken in the above statement.

I was thinking of something like

# mount --mkdir -t tmpfs none tmproot
# cp busybox tmproot/ && chmod +x tmproot/busybox
# mount --move tmproot /
# env LL_FS_RW=/ LL_FS_RO=/.. ./sandboxer chroot /.. /busybox sh
  # echo can write to root > /a
  sh: can't create /a: Permission denied
  ^^^^ this does not work, but I was mistakenly thinking it would

I think because choose_mountpoint_rcu only returns true if
    if (mountpoint != m->mnt.mnt_root)
passes, this situation won't cause ret to be true in your code.

But then I can't think of when
      if (unlikely(IS_ROOT(path->dentry)))
          return ret;
would ever return true, unless somehow d_parent is corrupted?  Maybe I'm
just missing something obvious here.

Anyway, since there's a suggestion from Neil to refactor this, this might
not be too important, so feel free to ignore for now.

> 
> Thanks,
> Song
> 
>> A quick suggestion although I haven't tested anything - maybe we should do
>> a special case check for IS_ROOT inside the
>>     if (unlikely(path->dentry == path->mnt->mnt_root))
>> ? Before "path_put(path);", if IS_ROOT(p.dentry) then we just path_get(p)
>> and return false.
>>
>>>
>>>         parent = dget_parent(path->dentry);
>>>         dput(path->dentry);
>>>         path->dentry = parent;
>>>         return true;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Song
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-11  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-06 21:30 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] bpf path iterator Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent() Song Liu
2025-06-10 17:18   ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-06-10 17:26     ` Song Liu
2025-06-10 22:26       ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-10 22:34         ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-10 23:08         ` Song Liu
2025-06-11  0:23           ` Tingmao Wang [this message]
2025-06-10 23:34   ` NeilBrown
2025-06-11  0:56     ` Song Liu
2025-06-11 15:42       ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-06-11 16:31         ` Song Liu
2025-06-11 17:50           ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-11 18:08             ` Song Liu
2025-06-12  9:01               ` Jan Kara
2025-06-12  9:49                 ` Jan Kara
2025-06-12 12:31                   ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-16  0:24                     ` Ref-less parent walk from Landlock (was: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent()) Tingmao Wang
2025-06-17  6:20                       ` Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/5] landlock: Use path_walk_parent() Song Liu
2025-06-08 18:45   ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Introduce path iterator Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf " Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Path walk test Song Liu
2025-06-08 17:32 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] bpf path iterator Tingmao Wang
2025-06-09  6:23   ` Song Liu
2025-06-09  8:08     ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-11 11:36       ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-11 15:39         ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-06-08 17:32 ` Tingmao Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fd995e37-9369-4375-8718-8338e732860f@maowtm.org \
    --to=m@maowtm.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=repnop@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®