From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Hc Zheng <zhenghc00@gmail.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug] x86/resctrl: unexpect mbm_local_bytes/mbm_total_bytes delta on AMD with multiple RMIDs in the same domain
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:42:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd9d8b12-97b7-47eb-a26d-54a8148bc57f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a148b764-0609-433e-b6e9-932493f6c1b1@intel.com>
Hi Hc Zheng,
On 7/29/25 11:49, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> +Babu
>
> Hi Huaicheng Zheng,
>
> On 7/29/25 12:53 AM, Hc Zheng wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We have enable resctrl on container platform. We notice some unexpect
>> behaviors when multiple containers running in the same L3 domain.
>> the mbm_local_bytes/mbm_total_bytes for such mon_groups return
>> Unavailable or delta with two consecutive reads is out of normal range
>> (eg: 1000+GB/s)
>>
>> after reading the AMD pqos manual(), it says
>> """
>> Potential causes of the “U” bit being set include
>> (but are not limited to):
>>
>> • RMID is not currently tracked by the hardware.
>> • RMID was not tracked by the hardware at some time since it was last read.
>> • RMID has not been read since it started being tracked by the hardware.
>> """
>>
>> but no explanations for unexpect large delta between 2 reads of the
>> counters. After exam the kernel code, I suspect this would more likely
>> to be a hardware bugs
>>
>> here are the steps to reproduce it
>>
>> 1. create mon_groups
>>
>> $ for i in `seq 0 99`;do mkdir -p /sys/fs/resctrl/amdtest/mon_groups/test$i;done
Looks like you are creating 99 new groups here.
You can create more monitor groups, but hardware cannot count more than
32 RMIDs(or 16 in some old hardware) at a time.
>>
>> 2. run stress command and assigned such pid to each mon_groups , (I
>> have run such test on AMD Genoa. cpu 16-23,208-215 is on CCD 8)
>>
>> $ cat stress.sh
>> nohup numactl -C 16-23,208-215 stress -m 1 --vm-hang 1 > /dev/null &
>> lastPid=$!
>> echo $lastPid > /sys/fs/resctrl/amdtest/tasks
>> echo $lastPid > /sys/fs/resctrl/amdtest/mon_groups/test$1/tasks
>> $ for i in `seq 0 99`;do bash stress.sh $i ;done
>>
>> 3. watch the resctrl counter every 10 seconds
>>
>> $ while true ;do cat
>> /sys/fs/resctrl/amdtest/mon_groups/test9/mon_data/mon_L3_08/mbm_local_bytes;sleep
>> 10;done
>>
>> ...
>> Unavailable
>> Unavailable
>> Unavailable
>> 61924495182825856
>> 64176294690029568
>> Unavailable
>> Unavailable
>> Unavailable
>> ...
>>
>> at some point the delta for 2 consecutive reads is out of normal
>> range, (64176294690029568 - 61924495182825856) / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 /
>> 10 = 209715 Gb/s
>>
>> if I lower the concurrecy to like 59 or lower, the delta is in normal
>> range, and never return Unavailable. I have also tested on amd Rome
>> cpu, the problem still existed.
>> I have try this on intel platform, It does not have such problem, with
>> even over 200+ RMIDs concurrently being monitored.
>>
>> I can not find any documents about max RMID for AMD hardware can
>> concurrently holds, or a explanations for such problems.
>> I believe this could become even severe on AMD with more threads in
>> the future, as we will run more workloads on a single server
>>
>> Can some one help me to solve this problem, thanks
>
> It looks to me as though you are encountering the issue that is addressed with AMD's
> Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) feature that Babu is currently enabling
> in resctrl [1]. The feature itself is well documented in that series and includes links to
> the AMD spec where you can learn more.
> You show that the "Unavailable" is encountered when reading these counters from user
> space and I deduce from that that resctrl's internal MBM overflow handler (it runs once
> per second) likely encounters the same error with the consequence that overflows of the
> counter are not handled correctly.
Yea. The huge numbers are due to overflow problem. Kernel assumes there is
an overflow and adds a big number to account for the overflow in a
subsequent reads.
Yes. We are trying to address in the new hardware which is mentioned in [1].
>
> If you do have access to the AMD hardware with this feature, please do take a look at
> the resctrl support for it and try it out. We would all appreciate your feedback to ensure
> resctrl supports it well.
>
> Reinette
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1753467772.git.babu.moger@amd.com/
>
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-29 7:53 Hc Zheng
2025-07-29 16:49 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-07-29 17:42 ` Moger, Babu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd9d8b12-97b7-47eb-a26d-54a8148bc57f@amd.com \
--to=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenghc00@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®