mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>,
	Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
	Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/17] f2fs: support partial uptodate large folio read
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:18:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdaf1bef-3d10-4d54-a8c3-087804ca57cf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009162828.4188050-1-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>

On 10/10/26 00:28, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> Buffered write can have write bytes smaller than folio
> size for cases when folio minimum order is not zero.
> This can left partially uptodate folio in page cache.
> So we skip uptodate subpage read in read_data_large_folio.
> Also mark hole subpage uptodate in uptodate bitmap.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/data.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 6f6f5223951d..21c43019167a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static void f2fs_finish_read_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
>   		struct folio *folio = fi.folio;
>   		unsigned nr_pages = fi.length >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>   		bool finished = true;
> +		bool uptodate = bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK;
>   
>   		if (!folio_test_large(folio) &&
>   		    f2fs_is_compressed_page(folio)) {
> @@ -163,6 +164,9 @@ static void f2fs_finish_read_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
>   				(struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
>   
>   			spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> +			if (bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK)
> +				uptodate = __ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, ffs,
> +						fi.offset, fi.length);
>   			ffs->read_pages_pending -= nr_pages;
>   			finished = !ffs->read_pages_pending;
>   			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> @@ -172,7 +176,8 @@ static void f2fs_finish_read_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
>   			dec_cache_count(F2FS_F_SB(folio), F2FS_RD_DATA);
>   
>   		if (finished)
> -			folio_end_read(folio, bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK);
> +			folio_end_read(folio,
> +				bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK && uptodate);

Looks weird, can we initial uptodate to true directly? and only update it according
to __ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(), rather than (bio->bi_status == BLK_STS_OK)?

>   	}
>   
>   	if (ctx)
> @@ -3071,6 +3076,56 @@ static bool find_next_valid_block(const struct folio *folio,
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
> +static unsigned int ffs_next_uptodate_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> +			unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
> +{
> +	return find_next_bit(ffs->state, end + 1, start);
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int ffs_next_nonuptodate_subpage(struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs,
> +			unsigned int start, unsigned int end)
> +{
> +	return find_next_zero_bit(ffs->state, end + 1, start);
> +}
> +
> +static void f2fs_skip_fully_uptodate_front(struct folio *folio,
> +			pgoff_t *index, pgoff_t *offset, unsigned int *nrpages,
> +			unsigned int *max_nr_pages)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int next, skipped;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio) || !*nrpages)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +	next = ffs_next_nonuptodate_subpage(ffs, *offset,
> +					    *offset + *nrpages - 1);
> +	skipped = next - *offset;
> +	if (!skipped)
> +		return;
> +
> +	*index += skipped;
> +	*offset += skipped;
> +	*nrpages -= skipped;
> +	*max_nr_pages -= skipped;
> +}
> +
> +static void f2fs_truncate_read_extent(struct folio *folio, pgoff_t offset,
> +				     unsigned int *len_blks)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> +	unsigned int next, end;
> +
> +	if (!f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio) || *len_blks <= 1)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ffs = (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
> +	end = offset + *len_blks - 1;
> +	next = ffs_next_uptodate_subpage(ffs, offset + 1, end);
> +	if (next <= end)
> +		*len_blks = next - offset;
> +}

Blank line.

Thanks,

>   static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
>   		struct fsverity_info *vi,
>   		struct readahead_control *rac, struct folio *folio)
> @@ -3115,6 +3170,11 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
>   
>   		len_blks = 1;
>   
> +		f2fs_skip_fully_uptodate_front(folio, &index, &offset,
> +					       &nrpages, &max_nr_pages);
> +		if (!nrpages)
> +			break;
> +
>   		/*
>   		 * Map blocks using the previous result first.
>   		 */
> @@ -3147,6 +3207,7 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
>   			len_blks = min_t(unsigned int, nrpages, max_nr_pages);
>   			len_blks = min_t(unsigned int, len_blks,
>   					(unsigned int)(map.m_lblk + map.m_len - index));
> +			f2fs_truncate_read_extent(folio, offset, &len_blks);
>   
>   			for (i = 0; i < len_blks; i++) {
>   				if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> @@ -3165,6 +3226,13 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
>   				ret = -EIO;
>   				goto err_out;
>   			}
> +			if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> +				ffs = f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
> +				spin_lock_irq(&ffs->state_lock);
> +				__ffs_mark_subrange_uptodate(folio, ffs,
> +						page_offset, PAGE_SIZE);
> +				spin_unlock_irq(&ffs->state_lock);
> +			}
>   			continue;
>   		}
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09 16:12 [PATCH v3 00/17] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 18:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-10-10 10:02     ` Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  3:01   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-12 13:06     ` [f2fs-dev] " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  3:06   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  4:36   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] f2fs: account large folio dirty data at block granularity Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  6:54   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] f2fs: remove mappedtodisk flag usage in mmap write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  7:04   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  7:09   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-12  7:18   ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 18:14   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-10-12  7:27   ` Chao Yu
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] f2fs: wait for folio writeback before ffs_detach_free Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-09 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-10-13 22:30 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 00/17] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files patchwork-bot+f2fs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fdaf1bef-3d10-4d54-a8c3-087804ca57cf@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
    --cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
    --cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=daehojeong@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyescas@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=nzzhao@126.com \
    --cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®