From: "Neronin, Niklas" <niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com>
To: Youngjoon Lee <getfeus@gmail.com>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: fix ERST max field conversion
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:34:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdc17e7b-5b79-4b52-a1a9-929ec1565768@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827053748.3755-1-getfeus@gmail.com>
On 27/08/2026 8.37, Youngjoon Lee wrote:
> Commit 6d45e9556d4a ("usb: xhci: standardize multi bit-field
> macros") converted the ERST maximum calculation from BIT() to a
> left shift. These operations are not equivalent because the
> HCS_ERST_MAX field contains an exponent.
>
> On an MT8173 xHCI controller where HCS_ERST_MAX is zero, the new
> calculation produces zero event ring segments. This reaches
> dma_alloc_coherent() with a zero size, triggers a page allocator
> warning, and prevents xHCI from probing with -ENOMEM.
>
> Preserve the original calculation by applying BIT() to the value
> extracted with FIELD_GET().
>
> This restores the USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 root hubs on MT8173. A USB
> webcam and both USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 hubs enumerate successfully,
> and the previous ERST allocation failure is no longer present.
>
> Fixes: 6d45e9556d4a ("usb: xhci: standardize multi bit-field macros")
> Signed-off-by: Youngjoon Lee <getfeus@gmail.com>
Thanks for the report and patch.
This issue has already been addressed in:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/7e6648ad-7459-4248-8c6c-227cfc2586d8@linux.intel.com/
-Niklas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 5:37 Youngjoon Lee
2026-08-27 6:34 ` Neronin, Niklas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdc17e7b-5b79-4b52-a1a9-929ec1565768@linux.intel.com \
--to=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=getfeus@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®