From: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>,
leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/cm: fix cond_no_effect.cocci warnings
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:15:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdc5931f-5794-1770-0a5d-7470965cf390@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220624201733.GA284068@nvidia.com>
> Yes, this is a standard pattern for walking tree with priority, we
> should not obfuscate it.
>
> The final else means 'equal' and the first if should ideally be placed
> there
>
> However this function is complicated by the use of the service_mask
> for equality checking, and it doesn't even work right if the
> service_mask is not -1.
>
> If someone wants to clean this then please go through and eliminate
> service_mask completely. From what I can see its value is always -1.
> Three patches:
> - Remove the service_mask parameter from ib_cm_listen(), all callers
> use 0
> - Remove the service_mask parameter from cm_init_listen(), all
> callers use 0. Inspect and remove cm_id_priv->id.service_mask,
> it is the constant value ~cpu_to_be64(0) which is a NOP when &'d
> - Move the test at the top of cm_find_listen() into the final else
>
I'll do it. For the 3rd one, do you mean a patch like (similar change in
cm_insert_listen):
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
index a2973436b16f..8749165bbe3d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c
@@ -626,9 +626,15 @@ static struct cm_id_private
*cm_insert_listen(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
parent = *link;
cur_cm_id_priv = rb_entry(parent, struct cm_id_private,
service_node);
- if ((cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_mask & service_id) ==
- (service_mask & cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id) &&
- (cm_id_priv->id.device == cur_cm_id_priv->id.device)) {
+ if (cm_id_priv->id.device < cur_cm_id_priv->id.device)
+ link = &(*link)->rb_left;
+ else if (cm_id_priv->id.device > cur_cm_id_priv->id.device)
+ link = &(*link)->rb_right;
+ else if (be64_lt(service_id, cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
+ link = &(*link)->rb_left;
+ else if (be64_gt(service_id, cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
+ link = &(*link)->rb_right;
+ else {
/*
* Sharing an ib_cm_id with different handlers
is not
* supported
@@ -644,17 +650,6 @@ static struct cm_id_private
*cm_insert_listen(struct cm_id_private *cm_id_priv,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cm.lock, flags);
return cur_cm_id_priv;
}
-
- if (cm_id_priv->id.device < cur_cm_id_priv->id.device)
- link = &(*link)->rb_left;
- else if (cm_id_priv->id.device > cur_cm_id_priv->id.device)
- link = &(*link)->rb_right;
- else if (be64_lt(service_id, cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
- link = &(*link)->rb_left;
- else if (be64_gt(service_id, cur_cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
- link = &(*link)->rb_right;
- else
- link = &(*link)->rb_right;
}
cm_id_priv->listen_sharecount++;
rb_link_node(&cm_id_priv->service_node, parent, link);
@@ -671,12 +666,6 @@ static struct cm_id_private *cm_find_listen(struct
ib_device *device,
while (node) {
cm_id_priv = rb_entry(node, struct cm_id_private,
service_node);
- if ((cm_id_priv->id.service_mask & service_id) ==
- cm_id_priv->id.service_id &&
- (cm_id_priv->id.device == device)) {
- refcount_inc(&cm_id_priv->refcount);
- return cm_id_priv;
- }
if (device < cm_id_priv->id.device)
node = node->rb_left;
else if (device > cm_id_priv->id.device)
@@ -685,8 +674,10 @@ static struct cm_id_private *cm_find_listen(struct
ib_device *device,
node = node->rb_left;
else if (be64_gt(service_id, cm_id_priv->id.service_id))
node = node->rb_right;
- else
- node = node->rb_right;
+ else {
+ refcount_inc(&cm_id_priv->refcount);
+ return cm_id_priv;
+ }
}
return NULL;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-10 9:45 Jiapeng Chong
2022-06-14 1:19 ` Mark Zhang
2022-06-24 20:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-08-02 2:15 ` Mark Zhang [this message]
2022-08-02 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdc5931f-5794-1770-0a5d-7470965cf390@nvidia.com \
--to=markzhang@nvidia.com \
--cc=abaci@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®