From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA0313119B; Thu, 9 May 2024 12:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715258381; cv=none; b=a+HYxsZpgXbJGT2ocFgDuCqLObOHJy4Dqwqo0d9q90JRKeCPimDELdlMnKUvwxkPUL4YWN+zQarKJXLK5/ZRNKrIRwESzpX5e9AoW0k665eVDzgLt98zNlzHlDV+4B616TAW8DoHbMs+fAR6x6lWc283hQERQ9ZTBKIr9VMmV+s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715258381; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h/H+VWcrKdPCeRsMnTJ5qIW/usfR2btKbHYoM/e3sD0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jga2T4g1SrS1zUwh9gAZctc2dazrMjTSeovcAkw75/+RZKtintphZJHdLntEmJT2AF4Lu+c1n5nSjXej3VRUXjfn9PY3nbU8cRoGL52E8glWtbmdkYoK9DusGKJoP821bJZXkKVpOXrNo583rqHcz3eVObf7z8IQiRkOLk8O3+o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=jGBTBGe5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="jGBTBGe5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1715258378; bh=h/H+VWcrKdPCeRsMnTJ5qIW/usfR2btKbHYoM/e3sD0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=jGBTBGe57sd0zXCM40msbfzUhN3DdM19CrtaY0pKzsFqrj/Zk8Dq7VMsBy0vr8LjD HCaw103NG8IgiSE5e+Rl3UbhMo+xn/s3c8gN+746bkRoHgARaPBf8saDRif2aBpv4i VBdcJF1LOWox2DwYr91aMANTUO0fkoOySbgdBDoPLt/Xrg8HO0s7HKCb6tNJP0MlZW ULqu/bktBbVdv1y1lMtdKbpiBV3JXyGk7XSWXV/E3g6Xf5ZCg3tvmyi1DsRK1XTPGd 0Ktk3LQ5ZgUv74FatyvLZpT08HJVxRRQsICZrwDYISOz/M8qPZmA1R8g4Cbk8NTFsq oRommdfpEWppA== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 622373782172; Thu, 9 May 2024 12:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 14:39:36 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: leds: mark label as depected to match description To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Wunderlich , Pavel Machek , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley Cc: Frank Wunderlich , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20240509110545.49889-1-linux@fw-web.de> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 09/05/24 13:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: > On 09/05/2024 13:05, Frank Wunderlich wrote: >> From: Frank Wunderlich >> >> The description for property 'label' describes it as deprected, so > > Typos here and in subject. > > >> add a option to mark it like that. Future devicetrees should use >> function and color properties. >> >> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >> Fixes: 24a71afe05a8 ("dt-bindings: leds: Convert common LED binding to schema") > > Nooo, that's not a fix. > > I don't think there was conclusion to make it deprecated on last attempt: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221122111124.6828-1-cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com/ > It's not a fix, agreed. But that property being deprecated deserves to be marked as deprecated, anyway. Otherwise the documentation shouldn't say in words that it is such. Cheers, Angelo