From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, gshan@redhat.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, sami.mujawar@arm.com,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: acpi: Enable ACPI CCEL support
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:35:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdd95a19-f787-428b-b184-a5de19469c0b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMv7tbA3JGd7ZcbW@willie-the-truck>
Hi Will
On 18/09/2025 13:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:35:19PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Add support for ACPI CCEL by handling the EfiACPIMemoryNVS type memory.
>> As per UEFI specifications NVS memory is reserved for Firmware use even
>> after exiting boot services. Thus map the region as read-only.
>>
>> Cc: Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1
>> - Map NVS region as read-only, update comment to clarify that the region
>> is reserved for firmware use.
>>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> index 4d529ff7ba51..93b70f48a51f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
>> @@ -360,6 +360,17 @@ void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys, acpi_size size)
>> prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO;
>> break;
>>
>> + case EFI_ACPI_MEMORY_NVS:
>> + /*
>> + * ACPI NVS marks an area reserved for use by the
>> + * firmware, even after exiting the boot service.
>> + * This may be used by the firmware for sharing dynamic
>> + * tables/data (e.g., ACPI CCEL) with the OS. Map it
>> + * as read-only.
>> + */
>> + prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO;
>> + break;
>> +
>
> Shouldn't this be merged with the other case handling read-only mappings?
> e.g. something like:
>
I thought about it, but went against it, to keep the code separate. But
surely this is fine. I will resend the series with the proposed change.
Suzuki
> switch (region->type) {
> case EFI_LOADER_CODE:
> case EFI_LOADER_DATA:
> case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_CODE:
> case EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA:
> case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
> case EFI_PERSISTENT_MEMORY:
> if (memblock_is_map_memory(phys) ||
> !memblock_is_region_memory(phys, size)) {
> pr_warn(FW_BUG "requested region covers kernel memory @ %pa\n", &phys);
> return NULL;
> }
> /*
> * Mapping kernel memory is permitted if the region in
> * question is covered by a single memblock with the
> * NOMAP attribute set: this enables the use of ACPI
> * table overrides passed via initramfs, which are
> * reserved in memory using arch_reserve_mem_area()
> * below. As this particular use case only requires
> * read access, fall through to the R/O mapping case.
> */
> fallthrough;
>
> case EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_CODE:
> /*
> * This would be unusual, but not problematic per se,
> * as long as we take care not to create a writable
> * mapping for executable code.
> */
> fallthrough;
>
> case EFI_ACPI_MEMORY_NVS:
> /*
> * ACPI NVS marks an area reserved for use by the
> * firmware, even after exiting the boot service.
> * This may be used by the firmware for sharing dynamic
> * tables/data (e.g., ACPI CCEL) with the OS. Map it
> * as read-only.
> */
> prot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO;
> break;
>
>
> With that, I'm happy to pick up the series (let me know if you want me
> to make the change above locally to save you a resend).
>
> Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 22:35 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: realm: Add support for encrypted data from firmware Suzuki K Poulose
2025-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: realm: ioremap: Allow mapping memory as encrypted Suzuki K Poulose
2025-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: Enable EFI secret area Securityfs support Suzuki K Poulose
2025-09-08 22:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: acpi: Enable ACPI CCEL support Suzuki K Poulose
2025-09-17 3:56 ` Gavin Shan
2025-09-18 12:31 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-18 12:35 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2025-09-16 15:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: realm: Add support for encrypted data from firmware Sami Mujawar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdd95a19-f787-428b-b184-a5de19469c0b@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®