From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-4.19.y] net: phy: reschedule state machine if AN has not completed in PHY_AN state
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 00:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdf0074a-2572-5914-6f3e-77202cbf96de@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200530214315.1051358-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
On 30.05.2020 23:43, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
>
> In kernel 4.19 (and probably earlier too) there are issues surrounding
> the PHY_AN state.
>
> For example, if a PHY is in PHY_AN state and AN has not finished, then
> what is supposed to happen is that the state machine gets rescheduled
> until it is, or until the link_timeout reaches zero which triggers an
> autoneg restart process.
>
> But actually the rescheduling never works if the PHY uses interrupts,
> because the condition under which rescheduling occurs is just if
> phy_polling_mode() is true. So basically, this whole rescheduling
> functionality works for AN-not-yet-complete just by mistake. Let me
> explain.
>
> Most of the time the AN process manages to finish by the time the
> interrupt has triggered. One might say "that should always be the case,
> otherwise the PHY wouldn't raise the interrupt, right?".
> Well, some PHYs implement an .aneg_done method which allows them to tell
> the state machine when the AN is really complete.
> The AR8031/AR8033 driver (at803x.c) is one such example. Even when
> copper autoneg completes, the driver still keeps the "aneg_done"
> variable unset until in-band SGMII autoneg finishes too (there is no
> interrupt for that). So we have the premises of a race condition.
>
That's not nice from the PHY:
It signals "link up", and if the system asks the PHY for link details,
then it sheepishly says "well, link is *almost* up".
Question would be whether the same happens with other SGMII-capable
PHY's so that we need to cater for this scenario in phylib.
Or whether we consider it a chip quirk. In the latter case a custom
read_status() handler might do the trick too: if link is reported
as up then wait until aneg is signaled as done too before reading
further link details.
And it's interesting that nobody else stumbled across this problem
before. I mean the PHY we talk about isn't really new. Or is your
use case so special?
> In practice, what really happens depends on the log level of the serial
> console. If the log level is verbose enough that kernel messages related
> to the Ethernet link state are printed to the console, then this gives
> in-band AN enough time to complete, which means the link will come up
> and everyone will be happy. But if the console is not that verbose, the
> link will sometimes come up, and sometimes will be forced down by the
> .aneg_done of the PHY driver (forever, since we are not rescheduling).
>
> The conclusion is that an extra condition needs to be explicitly added,
> so that the state machine can be rescheduled properly. Otherwise PHY
> devices in interrupt mode will never work properly if they have an
> .aneg_done callback.
>
> In more recent kernels, the whole PHY_AN state was removed by Heiner
> Kallweit in the "[net-next,0/5] net: phy: improve and simplify phylib
> state machine" series here:
>
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/994464/
>
> and the problem was just masked away instead of being addressed with a
> punctual patch.
>
> Fixes: 76a423a3f8f1 ("net: phy: allow driver to implement their own aneg_done")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> ---
> I'm not sure the procedure I'm following is correct, sending this
> directly to Greg. The patch doesn't apply on net.
>
> drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> index cc454b8c032c..ca4fd74fd2c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
> struct phy_device *phydev =
> container_of(dwork, struct phy_device, state_queue);
> - bool needs_aneg = false, do_suspend = false;
> + bool recheck = false, needs_aneg = false, do_suspend = false;
> enum phy_state old_state;
> int err = 0;
> int old_link;
> @@ -981,6 +981,8 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> phy_link_up(phydev);
> } else if (0 == phydev->link_timeout--)
> needs_aneg = true;
> + else
> + recheck = true;
> break;
> case PHY_NOLINK:
> if (!phy_polling_mode(phydev))
> @@ -1123,7 +1125,7 @@ void phy_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> * PHY, if PHY_IGNORE_INTERRUPT is set, then we will be moving
> * between states from phy_mac_interrupt()
> */
> - if (phy_polling_mode(phydev))
> + if (phy_polling_mode(phydev) || recheck)
> queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &phydev->state_queue,
> PHY_STATE_TIME * HZ);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-30 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-30 21:43 Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-30 22:36 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2020-05-30 22:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-31 0:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-31 21:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-01 0:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-01 20:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-06-01 21:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-06-01 21:38 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdf0074a-2572-5914-6f3e-77202cbf96de@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®