From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF6601C5D6A; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 14:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744034895; cv=none; b=LYpvrSSECOP6/61wpGzRsfUCBe3e9+DKGlkaiIPg/oDBLgtwUOMtmjJcyNnLf+c+XonGfDnahs0ECX83L5TuIMsXNiTaLKB0wV//fpG3q7fDx5aZg9cvi5Y/1/4LSlITogEeS/MrokswlqTPaoaBKOCrKzF8U+xxrf3k23ThEhA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744034895; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5Ybx/iOk+2GUXHdmzGiKkhK+smCndiqXpTBToD/+yAk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=M9PWhrhTy4UPz3BrBKiZyl2PUq7ycVsELEAyaaRwpW70j1UHYlBrtuW1ZHPE1ASCkvVnreDOTEk9qpKmwfguRKvJNEbF3yTO0yKz+BJqCABg7M8alUVCY/Se+dLKsjixrNNlb79Vkq+ldmR/HzBVhQkK+9zPNW2od6tjo1lgcoU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=L4XVTbFJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="L4XVTbFJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=MtwfmjXfQNUVZqbiDeY9oM+qm820t7eNIzvQ5yyWlhM=; b=L4XVTbFJplMI/iy67enp9jpKyw 0op+AcLA7KqrPDGGUjvrE9AQQba2NqZ/ylurfFa/TxomDCg8uZJ2Z7t9HCZh39uTQwXx6wTmv4XYP nUMJgmzdsYNfQJ/B3hlsBIVW/Lrl/bPS5sYx5C9H5maKIOCz9OMESRl0gNaBqdHLZ2MI=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1u1n8u-008F08-UT; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:08:04 +0200 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:08:04 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Kory Maincent Cc: Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Marek =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beh=FAn?= , Richard Cochran , Thomas Petazzoni , Maxime Chevallier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Add Marvell PHY PTP support Message-ID: References: <20250407-feature_marvell_ptp-v2-0-a297d3214846@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250407-feature_marvell_ptp-v2-0-a297d3214846@bootlin.com> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 04:02:59PM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote: > Add PTP basic support for Marvell 88E151x PHYs. Russell has repeatedly said this will cause regressions in some setups where there are now two PTP implementations, and the wrong one will be chosen by default. I would expect some comments in the commit message explaining how this has been addressed, so it is clear a regression will not happen. Andrew