mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	lpieralisi@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, mani@kernel.org,
	kwilczynski@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: robh@kernel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] PCI: of: Remove max-link-speed generation validation
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:21:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe101f10-a56f-49e2-bece-88461f28f460@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c558d65-edca-f3a9-9e31-01d30a206e7f@rock-chips.com>



On 2026/3/9 08:38, Shawn Lin wrote:
> 在 2026/03/08 星期日 22:26, Hans Zhang 写道:
>> The of_pci_get_max_link_speed() function currently validates the
>> "max-link-speed" DT property to be in the range 1..4 (Gen1..Gen4).
>> This imposes a maintenance burden because each new PCIe generation
>> would require updating this validation.
>>
>> Remove the range check so the function returns the raw property value
>> (or a negative error code if the property is missing or malformed).
>> Callers must now validate the returned speed against the range they
>> support.  A subsequent patch adds such validation to the DWC driver,
>> which is the primary user of this function.
>>
>> This change allows future PCIe generations to be supported without
>> modifying drivers/pci/of.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
>> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/of.c | 7 ++++---
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> index 9f8eb5df279e..cff5fd337c2b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> @@ -889,10 +889,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_supply_present);
>>   int of_pci_get_max_link_speed(struct device_node *node)
>>   {
>>       u32 max_link_speed;
>> +    int ret;
> 
> Should update the comment of this function, as it states:
> "-EINVAL    - Invalid "max-link-speed" property value...
> a negative value if the * required property is not found or is invalid."
> 
> So it won't validate the speed after this patch. Perhaps it's even
> better to note the caller to take the responsiblity to validate it.
> 

Hi Shawn,

I plan to modify it as follows. If there are any mistakes, please point 
them out. Thank you very much.

diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
index 9f8eb5df279e..fbb779a94202 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/of.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
@@ -875,8 +875,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_supply_present);
   * of_pci_get_max_link_speed - Find the maximum link speed of the 
given device node.
   * @node: Device tree node with the maximum link speed information.
   *
- * This function will try to find the limitation of link speed by finding
- * a property called "max-link-speed" of the given device node.
+ * This function will try to read the "max-link-speed" property of the 
given
+ * device tree node. It does NOT validate the value of the property (e.g.,
+ * range checks for PCIe generations).
   *
   * Return:
   * * > 0	- On success, a maximum link speed.
@@ -889,10 +890,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_supply_present);
  int of_pci_get_max_link_speed(struct device_node *node)
  {
  	u32 max_link_speed;
+	int ret;

-	if (of_property_read_u32(node, "max-link-speed", &max_link_speed) ||
-	    max_link_speed == 0 || max_link_speed > 4)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "max-link-speed", &max_link_speed);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;

  	return max_link_speed;
  }


Best regards,
Hans

>> -    if (of_property_read_u32(node, "max-link-speed", &max_link_speed) ||
>> -        max_link_speed == 0 || max_link_speed > 4)
>> -        return -EINVAL;
>> +    ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "max-link-speed", &max_link_speed);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        return ret;
>>       return max_link_speed;
>>   }
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-09 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-08 14:26 [PATCH v7 0/2] " Hans Zhang
2026-03-08 14:26 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] " Hans Zhang
2026-03-09  0:38   ` Shawn Lin
2026-03-09 14:21     ` Hans Zhang [this message]
2026-03-09 11:47   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-09 14:47     ` Hans Zhang
2026-03-10 22:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-12 16:18     ` Hans Zhang
2026-03-08 14:26 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] PCI: dwc: Validate max-link-speed property Hans Zhang
2026-03-08 18:10   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-09 14:45     ` Hans Zhang
2026-03-09 11:11   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-09 15:44   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe101f10-a56f-49e2-bece-88461f28f460@163.com \
    --to=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®