From: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
To: <miklos@szeredi.hu>, <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linfeilong <linfeilong@huawei.com>,
lihaotian <lihaotian9@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: check whether fuse_request_alloc returns NULL in fuse_simple_request
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:09:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe1d287f-a1d6-cb49-da5e-7568e30bf25a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b99b141d-acb8-954e-c932-7d7f402db9b3@huawei.com>
Sorry for ignoring __GFP_NOFAIL flag.
Please ignore this patch.
On 2020/11/5 9:33, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
> ping ...
>
> On 2020/10/22 21:13, Zhiqiang Liu wrote:
>>
>> In fuse_simple_request func, we will call fuse_request_alloc func to alloc
>> one request from fuse_req_cachep when args->force is true. However, the
>> return value of fuse_request_alloc func is not checked whether it is NULL.
>> If allocating request fails, access-NULL-pointer problem will occur.
>>
>> Here, we check the return value of fuse_request_alloc func.
>>
>> Fixes: 7213394c4e18 ("fuse: simplify request allocation")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Haotian Li <lihaotian9@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> fs/fuse/dev.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/dev.c b/fs/fuse/dev.c
>> index 02b3c36b3676..f7dd33ae8e31 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
>> @@ -481,6 +481,8 @@ ssize_t fuse_simple_request(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_args *args)
>> if (args->force) {
>> atomic_inc(&fc->num_waiting);
>> req = fuse_request_alloc(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOFAIL);
>> + if (!req)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> if (!args->nocreds)
>> fuse_force_creds(fc, req);
>>
>
>
> .
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-05 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-22 13:13 Zhiqiang Liu
2020-10-27 9:24 ` Zhiqiang Liu
2020-11-05 1:33 ` Zhiqiang Liu
2020-11-05 2:09 ` Zhiqiang Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe1d287f-a1d6-cb49-da5e-7568e30bf25a@huawei.com \
--to=liuzhiqiang26@huawei.com \
--cc=lihaotian9@huawei.com \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®