From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
To: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, song@kernel.org, colyli@kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
dave.jiang@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, dlemoal@kernel.org,
yanjun.zhu@linux.dev, kch@nvidia.com, hare@suse.de,
zhengqixing@huawei.com, john.g.garry@oracle.com,
geliang@kernel.org, xni@redhat.com, colyli@suse.de
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] badblocks: return boolen from badblocks_set() and badblocks_clear()
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 09:26:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe2dedca-0b71-3c80-6958-4bca61707fcc@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221081109.734170-11-zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com>
Hi,
Just two simple coding styes below.
在 2025/02/21 16:11, Zheng Qixing 写道:
> From: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@huawei.com>
>
> Change the return type of badblocks_set() and badblocks_clear()
> from int to bool, indicating success or failure. Specifically:
>
> - _badblocks_set() and _badblocks_clear() functions now return
> true for success and false for failure.
> - All calls to these functions have been updated to handle the
> new boolean return type.
> - This change improves code clarity and ensures a more consistent
> handling of success and failure states.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing@huawei.com>
> ---
> block/badblocks.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 17 ++++++++--------
> drivers/md/md.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/badblocks.h | 6 +++---
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
> index 79d91be468c4..8f057563488a 100644
> --- a/block/badblocks.c
> +++ b/block/badblocks.c
> @@ -836,8 +836,8 @@ static bool try_adjacent_combine(struct badblocks *bb, int prev)
> }
>
> /* Do exact work to set bad block range into the bad block table */
> -static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> - int acknowledged)
> +static bool _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> + int acknowledged)
> {
> int len = 0, added = 0;
> struct badblocks_context bad;
> @@ -847,11 +847,11 @@ static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>
> if (bb->shift < 0)
> /* badblocks are disabled */
> - return 1;
> + return false;
>
> if (sectors == 0)
> /* Invalid sectors number */
> - return 1;
> + return false;
>
> if (bb->shift) {
> /* round the start down, and the end up */
> @@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ static int _badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
>
> write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&bb->lock, flags);
>
> - return sectors;
> + return sectors == 0;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1048,21 +1048,20 @@ static int front_splitting_clear(struct badblocks *bb, int prev,
> }
>
> /* Do the exact work to clear bad block range from the bad block table */
> -static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
> +static bool _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
> {
> struct badblocks_context bad;
> int prev = -1, hint = -1;
> int len = 0, cleared = 0;
> - int rv = 0;
> u64 *p;
>
> if (bb->shift < 0)
> /* badblocks are disabled */
> - return 1;
> + return false;
>
> if (sectors == 0)
> /* Invalid sectors number */
> - return 1;
> + return false;
>
> if (bb->shift) {
> sector_t target;
> @@ -1182,9 +1181,9 @@ static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
> write_sequnlock_irq(&bb->lock);
>
> if (!cleared)
> - rv = 1;
> + return false;
>
> - return rv;
> + return true;
> }
>
> /* Do the exact work to check bad blocks range from the bad block table */
> @@ -1338,11 +1337,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_check);
> * decide how best to handle it.
> *
> * Return:
> - * 0: success
> - * other: failed to set badblocks (out of space)
> + * true: success
> + * false: failed to set badblocks (out of space)
> */
> -int badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> - int acknowledged)
> +bool badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> + int acknowledged)
> {
> return _badblocks_set(bb, s, sectors, acknowledged);
> }
> @@ -1359,10 +1358,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(badblocks_set);
> * drop the remove request.
> *
> * Return:
> - * 0: success
> - * 1: failed to clear badblocks
> + * true: success
> + * false: failed to clear badblocks
> */
> -int badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
> +bool badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors)
> {
> return _badblocks_clear(bb, s, sectors);
> }
> @@ -1484,7 +1483,7 @@ ssize_t badblocks_store(struct badblocks *bb, const char *page, size_t len,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - if (badblocks_set(bb, sector, length, !unack))
> + if (!badblocks_set(bb, sector, length, !unack))
> return -ENOSPC;
> else
Since we're here, can you also remove the else branch as well?
> return len;
> diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> index d94ef37480bd..623db72ad66b 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
> @@ -559,14 +559,15 @@ static ssize_t nullb_device_badblocks_store(struct config_item *item,
> goto out;
> /* enable badblocks */
> cmpxchg(&t_dev->badblocks.shift, -1, 0);
> - if (buf[0] == '+')
> - ret = badblocks_set(&t_dev->badblocks, start,
> - end - start + 1, 1);
> - else
> - ret = badblocks_clear(&t_dev->badblocks, start,
> - end - start + 1);
> - if (ret == 0)
> - ret = count;
> + if (buf[0] == '+') {
> + if (badblocks_set(&t_dev->badblocks, start,
> + end - start + 1, 1))
> + ret = count;
> + } else {
> + if (badblocks_clear(&t_dev->badblocks, start,
> + end - start + 1))
else if ()
Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Thanks
> + ret = count;
> + }
> out:
> kfree(orig);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 30b3dbbce2d2..49d826e475cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -1748,7 +1748,7 @@ static int super_1_load(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct md_rdev *refdev, int minor_
> count <<= sb->bblog_shift;
> if (bb + 1 == 0)
> break;
> - if (badblocks_set(&rdev->badblocks, sector, count, 1))
> + if (!badblocks_set(&rdev->badblocks, sector, count, 1))
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> } else if (sb->bblog_offset != 0)
> @@ -9846,7 +9846,6 @@ int rdev_set_badblocks(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors,
> int is_new)
> {
> struct mddev *mddev = rdev->mddev;
> - int rv;
>
> /*
> * Recording new badblocks for faulty rdev will force unnecessary
> @@ -9862,33 +9861,35 @@ int rdev_set_badblocks(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors,
> s += rdev->new_data_offset;
> else
> s += rdev->data_offset;
> - rv = badblocks_set(&rdev->badblocks, s, sectors, 0);
> - if (rv == 0) {
> - /* Make sure they get written out promptly */
> - if (test_bit(ExternalBbl, &rdev->flags))
> - sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_unack_badblocks);
> - sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_state);
> - set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
> - BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN) | BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
> - md_wakeup_thread(rdev->mddev->thread);
> - return 1;
> - } else
> +
> + if (!badblocks_set(&rdev->badblocks, s, sectors, 0))
> return 0;
> +
> + /* Make sure they get written out promptly */
> + if (test_bit(ExternalBbl, &rdev->flags))
> + sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_unack_badblocks);
> + sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_state);
> + set_mask_bits(&mddev->sb_flags, 0,
> + BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_CLEAN) | BIT(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING));
> + md_wakeup_thread(rdev->mddev->thread);
> + return 1;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rdev_set_badblocks);
>
> int rdev_clear_badblocks(struct md_rdev *rdev, sector_t s, int sectors,
> int is_new)
> {
> - int rv;
> if (is_new)
> s += rdev->new_data_offset;
> else
> s += rdev->data_offset;
> - rv = badblocks_clear(&rdev->badblocks, s, sectors);
> - if ((rv == 0) && test_bit(ExternalBbl, &rdev->flags))
> +
> + if (!badblocks_clear(&rdev->badblocks, s, sectors))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (test_bit(ExternalBbl, &rdev->flags))
> sysfs_notify_dirent_safe(rdev->sysfs_badblocks);
> - return rv;
> + return 1;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rdev_clear_badblocks);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
> index a002ea6fdd84..ee478ccde7c6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void set_badblock(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int num)
> dev_dbg(bb->dev, "Found a bad range (0x%llx, 0x%llx)\n",
> (u64) s * 512, (u64) num * 512);
> /* this isn't an error as the hardware will still throw an exception */
> - if (badblocks_set(bb, s, num, 1))
> + if (!badblocks_set(bb, s, num, 1))
> dev_info_once(bb->dev, "%s: failed for sector %llx\n",
> __func__, (u64) s);
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/badblocks.h b/include/linux/badblocks.h
> index 670f2dae692f..8764bed9ff16 100644
> --- a/include/linux/badblocks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/badblocks.h
> @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ struct badblocks_context {
>
> int badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> sector_t *first_bad, int *bad_sectors);
> -int badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> - int acknowledged);
> -int badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors);
> +bool badblocks_set(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors,
> + int acknowledged);
> +bool badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, int sectors);
> void ack_all_badblocks(struct badblocks *bb);
> ssize_t badblocks_show(struct badblocks *bb, char *page, int unack);
> ssize_t badblocks_store(struct badblocks *bb, const char *page, size_t len,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-22 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 8:10 [PATCH 00/12] badblocks: bugfix and cleanup for badblocks Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 8:10 ` [PATCH 01/12] badblocks: Fix error shitf ops Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 9:05 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 9:58 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 8:10 ` [PATCH 02/12] badblocks: factor out a helper try_adjacent_combine Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 9:07 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 10:04 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 10:06 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 03/12] badblocks: attempt to merge adjacent badblocks during ack_all_badblocks Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 9:12 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 10:08 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 04/12] badblocks: return error directly when setting badblocks exceeds 512 Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 9:55 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-25 9:13 ` Li Nan
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 05/12] badblocks: return error if any badblock set fails Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 9:52 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 10:09 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 10:12 ` Coly Li
2025-02-22 1:12 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-22 6:16 ` Coly Li
2025-02-25 9:12 ` Li Nan
2025-02-22 6:18 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 06/12] badblocks: fix the using of MAX_BADBLOCKS Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 10:09 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-02-25 9:14 ` Li Nan
2025-02-21 10:22 ` Coly Li
2025-02-22 1:15 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 07/12] badblocks: try can_merge_front before overlap_front Zheng Qixing
2025-02-22 1:14 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 08/12] badblocks: fix merge issue when new badblocks align with pre+1 Zheng Qixing
2025-02-22 1:21 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 09/12] badblocks: fix missing bad blocks on retry in _badblocks_check() Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 10:27 ` Coly Li
2025-02-22 1:28 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 10/12] badblocks: return boolen from badblocks_set() and badblocks_clear() Zheng Qixing
2025-02-22 1:26 ` Yu Kuai [this message]
2025-02-22 4:32 ` Paul Menzel
2025-02-22 4:36 ` Paul Menzel
2025-02-22 6:20 ` Coly Li
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 11/12] md: improve return types of badblocks handling functions Zheng Qixing
2025-02-22 1:27 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 8:11 ` [PATCH 12/12] badblocks: use sector_t instead of int to avoid truncation of badblocks length Zheng Qixing
2025-02-21 10:37 ` Coly Li
2025-02-22 1:43 ` Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 9:00 ` [PATCH 00/12] badblocks: bugfix and cleanup for badblocks Yu Kuai
2025-02-21 11:52 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe2dedca-0b71-3c80-6958-4bca61707fcc@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengqixing@huawei.com \
--cc=zhengqixing@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®